Monday's ETF Movers: PSI, QVML
ETF Performance: The Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF is down about 1% in Monday afternoon trading, underperforming other ETFs.
Weakest Components: Key contributors to this decline include Verizon Communications, which fell by approximately 6.4%, and Warner Bros. Discovery, which dropped around 4%.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Analyst Views on PSI
About the author
VGT or PSI: Which Investment is Superior?
Investment Options: Tech ETFs like the Vanguard Information Technology ETF and the Invesco Semiconductors ETF offer different benefits; VGT is more diversified with lower earning potential, while PSI is less diversified but has higher potential returns.
Performance Comparison: Over the past decade, VGT has averaged a 22.18% annual return, whereas PSI has achieved a 24.98% average annual return, highlighting the trade-off between risk and reward.
Risk Considerations: The Vanguard ETF's diversification helps limit risk during market volatility, while the Invesco ETF's focus on semiconductors increases risk but can lead to higher total returns.
Investment Strategy: Choosing between these ETFs depends on individual risk tolerance, investment goals, and the specific gaps investors want to fill in their portfolios.
What Your $100 Investment in the Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) a Decade Ago Would Be Worth Now
Investment Opportunity: The Invesco Semiconductors ETF has significantly outperformed the S&P 500 over the past decade, with a total return of 820% compared to the S&P's 233%, making it an attractive option for exposure to the AI sector.
Risk Consideration: While the ETF offers diversification through 30 semiconductor stocks, it remains a narrow investment focused on a specific subsector, which carries higher risks compared to broader market funds.
Long-Term Strategy: Investors are advised to maintain a diversified portfolio and adopt a long-term perspective to mitigate risks associated with short-term market volatility.
Alternative Recommendations: The Motley Fool's Stock Advisor has identified other stocks that may offer better returns than the Invesco Semiconductors ETF, emphasizing the importance of exploring various investment options.
Invesco Semiconductors ETF Sees Significant Withdrawal of Funds
PSI Stock Performance: PSI's stock has a 52-week low of $37.64 and a high of $67.85, with the last trade recorded at $67.70, indicating a strong position near its high point.
ETFs Trading Dynamics: Exchange traded funds (ETFs) function like stocks, with units that can be created or destroyed based on investor demand, impacting the underlying holdings significantly during notable inflows or outflows.
Putting the Pieces Together: PSI May Have a Value of $69
ETF Analysis: The Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has an implied analyst target price of $68.78, indicating a potential upside of 13.83% from its current trading price of $60.42.
Key Holdings: Notable underlying holdings with significant upside include Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM), Camtek Ltd (CAMT), and Nova Ltd (NVMI), which have target prices substantially higher than their recent trading prices.
Performance Insights: TSEM's average target is $63.26 (25.72% upside), CAMT's is $99.10 (18.88% upside), and NVMI's is $284.17 (13.95% upside), collectively representing 8.93% of the PSI ETF.
Analyst Justification: Questions arise regarding whether analysts' target prices are justified or overly optimistic, suggesting the need for further investor research into company and industry developments.
Friday's ETF Movers: TAN, PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF Performance: The Invesco Semiconductors ETF is down approximately 2.7% in Friday afternoon trading, with Applied Materials shares dropping about 13% and KLAC shares declining by around 7.9%.
Author's Views Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Nasdaq, Inc.
Wednesday's ETF Movers: SKYY, PSI
ETF Performance: The Invesco Semiconductors ETF is down approximately 1.6% in Wednesday afternoon trading, with ACM Research and Camtek showing significant declines of 18.4% and 7.6%, respectively.
Author's Opinion Disclaimer: The views expressed in the article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent Nasdaq, Inc.
VGT or PSI: Which Investment is Superior?
Investment Options: Tech ETFs like the Vanguard Information Technology ETF and the Invesco Semiconductors ETF offer different benefits; VGT is more diversified with lower earning potential, while PSI is less diversified but has higher potential returns.
Performance Comparison: Over the past decade, VGT has averaged a 22.18% annual return, whereas PSI has achieved a 24.98% average annual return, highlighting the trade-off between risk and reward.
Risk Considerations: The Vanguard ETF's diversification helps limit risk during market volatility, while the Invesco ETF's focus on semiconductors increases risk but can lead to higher total returns.
Investment Strategy: Choosing between these ETFs depends on individual risk tolerance, investment goals, and the specific gaps investors want to fill in their portfolios.
What Your $100 Investment in the Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) a Decade Ago Would Be Worth Now
Investment Opportunity: The Invesco Semiconductors ETF has significantly outperformed the S&P 500 over the past decade, with a total return of 820% compared to the S&P's 233%, making it an attractive option for exposure to the AI sector.
Risk Consideration: While the ETF offers diversification through 30 semiconductor stocks, it remains a narrow investment focused on a specific subsector, which carries higher risks compared to broader market funds.
Long-Term Strategy: Investors are advised to maintain a diversified portfolio and adopt a long-term perspective to mitigate risks associated with short-term market volatility.
Alternative Recommendations: The Motley Fool's Stock Advisor has identified other stocks that may offer better returns than the Invesco Semiconductors ETF, emphasizing the importance of exploring various investment options.
Invesco Semiconductors ETF Sees Significant Withdrawal of Funds
PSI Stock Performance: PSI's stock has a 52-week low of $37.64 and a high of $67.85, with the last trade recorded at $67.70, indicating a strong position near its high point.
ETFs Trading Dynamics: Exchange traded funds (ETFs) function like stocks, with units that can be created or destroyed based on investor demand, impacting the underlying holdings significantly during notable inflows or outflows.
Putting the Pieces Together: PSI May Have a Value of $69
ETF Analysis: The Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has an implied analyst target price of $68.78, indicating a potential upside of 13.83% from its current trading price of $60.42.
Key Holdings: Notable underlying holdings with significant upside include Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM), Camtek Ltd (CAMT), and Nova Ltd (NVMI), which have target prices substantially higher than their recent trading prices.
Performance Insights: TSEM's average target is $63.26 (25.72% upside), CAMT's is $99.10 (18.88% upside), and NVMI's is $284.17 (13.95% upside), collectively representing 8.93% of the PSI ETF.
Analyst Justification: Questions arise regarding whether analysts' target prices are justified or overly optimistic, suggesting the need for further investor research into company and industry developments.
Friday's ETF Movers: TAN, PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF Performance: The Invesco Semiconductors ETF is down approximately 2.7% in Friday afternoon trading, with Applied Materials shares dropping about 13% and KLAC shares declining by around 7.9%.
Author's Views Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Nasdaq, Inc.
Wednesday's ETF Movers: SKYY, PSI
ETF Performance: The Invesco Semiconductors ETF is down approximately 1.6% in Wednesday afternoon trading, with ACM Research and Camtek showing significant declines of 18.4% and 7.6%, respectively.
Author's Opinion Disclaimer: The views expressed in the article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent Nasdaq, Inc.
