Diamondback Secures More Than $1 Billion Through Deep Blue Agreement and EPIC Crude Sale
Written by Emily J. Thompson, Senior Investment Analyst
Updated: Sep 02 2025
0mins
Should l Buy COP?
Source: Benzinga
Diamondback Energy's Sale: Diamondback Energy Inc. is selling its Environmental Disposal Systems LLC unit to Deep Blue Midland Basin LLC for $750 million, while retaining a 30% stake and securing a 15-year commitment for water services across 12 counties in West Texas.
Additional Sale and Market Impact: The company is also selling its 27.5% interest in EPIC Crude Holdings LP to Plains All American Pipeline LP for $500 million, with potential contingent payments, as its stock experiences a slight decline.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Stop guessing "Should I Buy COP?" and start using high-conviction signals backed by rigorous historical data.
Sign up today to access powerful investing tools and make smarter, data-driven decisions.
Analyst Views on COP
Wall Street analysts forecast COP stock price to fall
19 Analyst Rating
15 Buy
3 Hold
1 Sell
Moderate Buy
Current: 122.600
Low
98.00
Averages
115.67
High
133.00
Current: 122.600
Low
98.00
Averages
115.67
High
133.00
About COP
ConocoPhillips is an exploration and production company. Its Alaska segment primarily explores for, produces, transports and markets crude oil, natural gas and NGLs. The Lower 48 segment consists of operations located in the 48 contiguous states in the United States and the Gulf of Mexico. Canadian operations consist of the Surmont oil sands development in Alberta, the liquids-rich Montney unconventional play in British Columbia and commercial operations. The Europe, Middle East and North Africa segment consists of operations principally located in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea, the Norwegian Sea, Qatar, Libya, Equatorial Guinea and commercial and terminalling operations in the United Kingdom. Asia Pacific segment has exploration and production operations in China, Malaysia, Australia and commercial operations in China, Singapore and Japan. Other International segment includes interests in Colombia as well as contingencies associated with prior operations in other countries.
About the author

Emily J. Thompson
Emily J. Thompson, a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) with 12 years in investment research, graduated with honors from the Wharton School. Specializing in industrial and technology stocks, she provides in-depth analysis for Intellectia’s earnings and market brief reports.
- Independent Chair Proposal: Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) has recommended that ConocoPhillips (COP) shareholders vote in favor of a proposal for an independent board chair, emphasizing the need for improved oversight of management to enhance transparency and accountability within the company’s governance structure.
- Insufficient Management Oversight: ISS highlighted that the dual role of current Chairman and CEO Ryan Lance could lead to conflicts of interest, potentially undermining the board's ability to effectively oversee management and thereby harming shareholder interests.
- Board's Opposition to Proposal: Despite ISS's support for the non-binding proposal, ConocoPhillips' board has advised shareholders to vote against it, reflecting internal disagreements regarding governance reform that may impact shareholder confidence in the company's future direction.
- Industry Comparison Analysis: ConocoPhillips' governance structure is similar to that of Exxon Mobil and Chevron, where the CEO also serves as chairman, while BP separates these roles, indicating differing perspectives on board structure within the industry that could influence investor decisions.
See More
- Ceasefire Extension: President Trump announced that Israel and Lebanon agreed to extend their ceasefire by three weeks, aiming to buy more time for diplomatic negotiations, although the ongoing tensions may impact investor confidence.
- Energy Security Threat: IEA head Fatih Birol warned that the current conflict has resulted in a loss of 13 million barrels of oil per day, marking the biggest energy security threat in history, which could trigger global market volatility.
- Market Reaction: U.S. stocks pulled back as investors grew wary of the ceasefire's prospects, while Asian markets opened mixed, reflecting a cautious sentiment regarding future developments.
- Corporate Layoffs: Meta plans to lay off 10% of its workforce, approximately 8,000 employees, while Nike will cut 1,400 jobs, indicating structural adjustments in the tech sector amid accelerated AI investments.
See More
- Price Fluctuations: Since the onset of the Iran war on February 28, Brent crude prices have fluctuated between $90 and $112 per barrel, with an average price of $103 in March, indicating the war's direct impact on the global oil market.
- Supply Disruption: Iran's ability to halt oil flow through the Strait of Hormuz has severely limited global supply, with experts predicting that even after the war ends, oil prices may stabilize between $75 and $95 per barrel, significantly above prewar levels.
- Infrastructure Damage: The war has inflicted substantial damage on oil and gas infrastructure in the Middle East, with repair costs estimated between $34 billion and $58 billion, and it will take months to restore production to prewar levels, exacerbating supply constraints.
- Economic Impact: While the U.S. economy is less reliant on oil than in the past, and most stocks remain unaffected, energy sector stocks have shown significant volatility, highlighting potential investment opportunities as oil prices are likely to remain elevated for some time.
See More
- Infrastructure Repair Costs: Energy consultancy Rystad Energy estimates that repairing damaged oil infrastructure will cost between $34 billion and $58 billion and take many months, which will have a long-term impact on global oil supply.
- Oil Price Fluctuation Analysis: Since the outbreak of the Iran war on February 28, Brent crude prices have fluctuated between $90 and $112 per barrel, with an average price of $103 in March, indicating the direct impact of the war on the market.
- Market Response and Investment Opportunities: Although energy stocks surged at the onset of the war, major energy stocks like ExxonMobil and Chevron have recently returned to near prewar levels, reflecting cautious market expectations regarding future oil prices.
- Economic Impact Assessment: While the U.S. economy is less reliant on oil than in the past, the rise in oil prices could still significantly affect the energy sector, especially given the slow recovery in production, prompting investors to carefully evaluate market opportunities.
See More
- Dividend Yield Advantage: The Schwab U.S. Dividend ETF boasts a 12-month dividend yield of 3.4%, tripling the S&P 500's yield of 1.1%, providing investors with a stronger cash return that can cushion against market volatility.
- Long-Term Performance: According to Ned Davis Research, dividend-paying stocks have delivered a 9.2% annualized total return over the past 50 years, while the Schwab ETF has exceeded 12% annualized returns, showcasing its superior performance and long-term investment value amid market fluctuations.
- Energy and Defense Stock Allocation: With 19.9% of its assets in energy stocks and a 3.2% stake in Lockheed Martin, the ETF is well-positioned to benefit from any resumption of conflict, enhancing its defensive nature and income potential.
- Future Growth Expectations: Even if the war ends, major holdings like Chevron and ConocoPhillips are expected to achieve over 10% compound annual growth in free cash flow through 2030, ensuring continued dividend growth and investment appeal.
See More
- Dividend Yield Advantage: The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF boasts a trailing 12-month dividend yield of 3.4%, tripling the S&P 500's yield of 1.1%, thus providing investors with higher cash returns that help cushion against market volatility.
- Long-Term Return Potential: Over the past 50 years, dividend-paying stocks have delivered an annualized total return of 9.2%, while the Schwab ETF has exceeded 12% annualized returns since its inception in 2011, making it an attractive option for income-seeking investors.
- Energy and Defense Stock Allocation: With 19.9% of its assets in energy stocks and a 3.2% stake in Lockheed Martin, the ETF is well-positioned to benefit from ongoing geopolitical tensions, enhancing its defensive characteristics.
- Cash Flow Growth Expectations: Chevron anticipates over 10% compound annual growth in free cash flow through 2030, while ConocoPhillips expects to nearly double its free cash flow by 2029, providing a solid foundation for sustained high dividend growth and reinforcing the ETF's investment appeal.
See More











