Two Impressive Dividends (Reaching 17%) That Seem Too Good to Be Real
Popularity of BDCs: Business development companies (BDCs) are gaining attention for their high dividends, often exceeding 12.9%, making them attractive for retirees and middle-market companies, but caution is advised due to potential risks like sector specialization and high management fees.
Risks of Specific BDCs: Examples like TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. and Goldman Sachs BDC illustrate the pitfalls of BDCs, including poor total returns and unsustainable dividends due to high management fees and losses in their portfolios.
Comparison with CEFs: The Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK) is highlighted as a safer investment alternative to BDCs, offering a stable 5% dividend, consistent performance against major indices, and a current discount to net asset value.
Opportunities in CEFs: There are several closed-end funds (CEFs) available that yield an average of 9.5%, presenting a compelling investment opportunity with potential for significant price appreciation, while maintaining lower risk compared to BDCs.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Analyst Views on TPVG
About TPVG
About the author

- Insider Buying Signal: Amid high market fear and low stock prices, insiders are actively purchasing shares, indicating their confidence in the company's future, particularly when stocks trade below book value, which adds strategic significance.
- High Dividend Appeal: Some companies offer nearly double-digit dividend yields, and despite market skepticism about their future performance, insider buying suggests that cash flow can support dividend payments, thereby boosting investor confidence.
- Sector Opportunities: In overlooked sectors like commercial real estate and energy, insider buying indicates that the true value of these assets is underestimated, especially during periods of high volatility and uncertainty, making these opportunities worth monitoring.
- Capital Discipline: Chord maintains a sustainable 5.4% dividend yield through stable cash flow and conservative capital spending strategies, reflecting that the combination of insider buying and high dividends in uncertain markets is an investment signal to watch closely.

Credit Facility Amendment: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC announced an amendment to its revolving credit facility, extending the revolving period to November 30, 2027, and the maturity date to May 30, 2029.
Improved Terms: The amendment includes a reduced spread on borrowings and higher advance rates on assets pledged to the borrowing base, enhancing the company's financial flexibility.
Current State of BDCs: Business Development Companies (BDCs) are facing increased pressure as rising base rates and competition in private credit create a more complex environment, leading to concerns about the sustainability of income streams and the quality of portfolio marks.
Insider Buying as a Signal: Despite the uncertainty, insider buying at firms like Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Blue Owl Capital Corp, and TriplePoint Venture Growth indicates confidence in their business models and suggests that management believes the market has overreacted to credit concerns.
Individual BDC Performance: Sixth Street Specialty Lending is noted for its disciplined lending and strong credit profile, while Blue Owl Capital Corp faces trust issues following a failed merger, and TriplePoint Venture Growth is experiencing elevated non-accruals but has seen significant insider purchases.
Investment Strategy: Investors are encouraged to focus on credit quality and insider activity during this turbulent period, as these factors can provide insights into the resilience and potential recovery of BDCs amidst market volatility.
Popularity of BDCs: Business development companies (BDCs) are gaining attention for their high dividends, often exceeding 12.9%, making them attractive for retirees and middle-market companies, but caution is advised due to potential risks like sector specialization and high management fees.
Risks of Specific BDCs: Examples like TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. and Goldman Sachs BDC illustrate the pitfalls of BDCs, including poor total returns and unsustainable dividends due to high management fees and losses in their portfolios.
Comparison with CEFs: The Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK) is highlighted as a safer investment alternative to BDCs, offering a stable 5% dividend, consistent performance against major indices, and a current discount to net asset value.
Opportunities in CEFs: There are several closed-end funds (CEFs) available that yield an average of 9.5%, presenting a compelling investment opportunity with potential for significant price appreciation, while maintaining lower risk compared to BDCs.

Real-time Intelligence: Benzinga Pro offers the fastest news alerts for traders, helping them stay informed and make timely decisions in the stock market.
Community and Exclusivity: Joining Benzinga Pro connects users with over 10,000 serious traders and provides access to exclusive stories and insights from Benzinga reporters.









