UWM Holdings Urges Shareholders to Vote Against Two Harbors Merger Proposal
UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) urged all stockholders of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) to VOTE AGAINST the CrossCountry Mortgage merger proposal on UWMC's BLUE proxy card in connection with the special meeting to be held at 10:00 a.m. ET on May 19, 2026. The company said, "As the deadline to vote rapidly approaches, UWMC reminds TWO stockholders that: UWMC's proposal offers stockholders $12.50 per share, while preserving the ability to elect to receive 2.3328 shares in UWMC stock for those stockholders that want stock consideration. Despite TWO's various contorted, hollow and misleading arguments, $12.50 is more than $12.00, adjusted for the interim period dividend. A stock election is a benefit of UWMC's proposal. TWO stockholders should have the freedom to choose to receive consideration in either cash or stock, and this option to participate as an investor in the combined company is not provided in the CCM merger. That option does not preclude any stockholders from choosing the cash consideration at a higher value than the CCM deal. UWMC has strong financing supported by a committed, unsecured bridge facility from Mizuho that is not subject to any financing condition, ratings triggers, collateral pools, borrowing-base tests, advance rate mechanics, or market-conditioned funding contingency. Mizuho also removed customary due diligence conditions that TWO questioned. UWMC is further supported by significant cash on its balance sheet and additional sources of liquidity. Stockholders can verify UWMC's strong position by reviewing its publicly filed financials, which provide transparency and certainty not provided by CCM. There is an expeditious path to completion with UWMC, given our strong relationships with national regulators, licensure in good standing in all 50 states, and work in support of our prior agreement to acquire TWO. The TWO Board admitted to ISS that it was unlikely a transaction with UWMC would be derailed in the regulatory approval process. We intend to close a transaction within approximately 2 months of signing an agreement. The TWO Board has conducted a pattern of bad-faith dealing, refusing to engage with UWMC even after repeated improvements to UWMC's proposals. As a result of its intransigence, the TWO Board has only achieved the minimum value possible for its stockholders. It is unconscionable for the TWO Board not to engage with the primary driver of value throughout this process. The CCM transaction features golden parachutes in the range of $35M as a reward for Two Harbors management - not stockholders - and may be the only real motivation for refusing to engage around superior proposals from UWMC...UWMC is eager to engage directly with the TWO Board and their advisors to address any concerns they have with the terms of UWMC's proposal and stands ready to work quickly to negotiate and consummate an agreement that achieves the best value for TWO stockholders. All three leading independent proxy advisors - ISS, Glass Lewis and Egan-Jones - agree that stockholders should vote AGAINST the CCM transaction because the TWO Board has not conducted a value-maximizing process, and engagement with UWMC's superior proposal is the best path forward. All three also recommended that stockholders vote AGAINST the accelerated management compensation packages."