UL Valuation

Unilever PLC

Add to Watchlist

Advanced Chart

61.470

+0.56(0.919%)1D

UL Relative Valuation

UL's fair value is calculated using relative valuation, based on historical P/E and P/S ranges and their premiums/discounts relative to a competitor average, adjusted by weights. If the market price exceeds this fair value range, UL is overvalued; if below, it's undervalued.

Historical Valuation

Unilever PLC (UL) is now in the Undervalued zone, suggesting that its current forward PE ratio of 17.23 is considered Undervalued compared with the five-year average of 17.92. The fair price of Unilever PLC (UL) is between 65.25 to 72.11 according to relative valuation methord. Compared to the current price of 61.47 USD , Unilever PLC is Undervalued By 5.79%.

Relative Value

Fair Zone

65.25-72.11

Current Price：61.47

5.79%

Undervalued

17.23

Trailing

Forward

12.31

EV/EBITDA

Unilever PLC. (UL) has a current EV/EBITDA of 12.31. The 5-year average EV/EBITDA is 12.47. The thresholds are as follows: Strongly Undervalued below 11.21, Undervalued between 11.21 and 11.84, Fairly Valued between 13.09 and 11.84, Overvalued between 13.09 and 13.72, and Strongly Overvalued above 13.72. The current Forward EV/EBITDA of 12.31 falls within the Historic Trend Line -Fairly Valued range.

14.05

EV/EBIT

Unilever PLC. (UL) has a current EV/EBIT of 14.05. The 5-year average EV/EBIT is 14.66. The thresholds are as follows: Strongly Undervalued below 12.98, Undervalued between 12.98 and 13.82, Fairly Valued between 15.51 and 13.82, Overvalued between 15.51 and 16.35, and Strongly Overvalued above 16.35. The current Forward EV/EBIT of 14.05 falls within the Historic Trend Line -Fairly Valued range.

52.56

Unilever PLC. (UL) has a current PS of 52.56. The 5-year average PS is 2.39. The thresholds are as follows: Strongly Undervalued below -5.18, Undervalued between -5.18 and -1.40, Fairly Valued between 6.18 and -1.40, Overvalued between 6.18 and 9.97, and Strongly Overvalued above 9.97. The current Forward PS of 52.56 falls within the Strongly Overvalued range.

14.55

P/OCF

Unilever PLC. (UL) has a current P/OCF of 14.55. The 5-year average P/OCF is 14.41. The thresholds are as follows: Strongly Undervalued below 12.51, Undervalued between 12.51 and 13.46, Fairly Valued between 15.37 and 13.46, Overvalued between 15.37 and 16.32, and Strongly Overvalued above 16.32. The current Forward P/OCF of 14.55 falls within the Historic Trend Line -Fairly Valued range.

18.58

P/FCF

Unilever PLC. (UL) has a current P/FCF of 18.58. The 5-year average P/FCF is 18.16. The thresholds are as follows: Strongly Undervalued below 15.79, Undervalued between 15.79 and 16.97, Fairly Valued between 19.34 and 16.97, Overvalued between 19.34 and 20.53, and Strongly Overvalued above 20.53. The current Forward P/FCF of 18.58 falls within the Historic Trend Line -Fairly Valued range.

Unilever PLC (UL) has a current Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 7.24. Compared to its 3-year average P/B ratio of 6.53 , the current P/B ratio is approximately 10.87% higher. Relative to its 5-year average P/B ratio of 6.68, the current P/B ratio is about 8.47% higher. Unilever PLC (UL) has a Forward Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield of approximately 5.09%. Compared to its 3-year average FCF yield of 5.66%, the current FCF yield is approximately -10.09% lower. Relative to its 5-year average FCF yield of 5.86% , the current FCF yield is about -13.15% lower.

7.24

P/B

Median3y

6.53

Median5y

6.68

5.09

FCF Yield

Median3y

5.66

Median5y

5.86

Competitors Valuation Multiple

The average P/S ratio for UL's competitors is 71.11, providing a benchmark for relative valuation. Unilever PLC Corp (UL) exhibits a P/S ratio of 52.56, which is -26.08% above the industry average. Given its robust revenue growth of %, this premium appears unsustainable.

P/S

P/E

EV/EBITDA

EV/EBIT

P/S

Revenue Growth

Market Cap

Estee Lauder Companies Inc

Church & Dwight Co Inc

86.86

4.96%

20.86B

Performance Decomposition

Market capitalization of UL increased by 0.00% over the past 1 year. The primary factor behind the change was an decrease in Unknown from 0.00 to 0.00.

The secondary factor is the Unknown, contributed 0.00%to the performance.

Overall, the performance of UL in the past 1 year is driven by Unknown.