EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Access earnings results, analyst expectations, report, slides, earnings call, and transcript.
Overview
The earnings call reveals mixed signals: while there is optimism about re-leasing spreads and demand from manufacturing onshoring, development leasing is slower than expected. Financial guidance shows slight improvements, but concerns remain about regional weaknesses and unclear management responses. The neutral sentiment reflects balanced positive and negative factors.
Key Financial Performance
Funds from Operations (FFO) per share $2.27 per share, up 6.6% year-over-year. The increase is attributed to good fundamentals in the 61 million-square-foot operating portfolio, which ended the quarter 96.7% leased.
Quarter-end Leasing 96.7% with occupancy at 95.9%. Average quarterly occupancy was 95.7%, down 100 basis points from the third quarter of 2024. The decline is due to market conditions and tenant cautiousness.
Quarterly Re-leasing Spreads 36% GAAP and 22% cash for leases signed during the quarter. Year-to-date results were slightly higher at 42% GAAP and 27% cash. The increase reflects strong demand and limited supply in the market.
Cash Same Store Growth 6.9% for the quarter and 6.2% year-to-date. The growth is driven by strong leasing activity and rent increases.
Top 10 Tenants' Rent Contribution 6.9% of rents, down 60 basis points from last year. This reflects the company's strategy to diversify its tenant base.
Debt-to-Total Market Capitalization 14.1%. This indicates a strong balance sheet and financial flexibility.
Unadjusted Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio 2.9x. This reflects the company's low leverage and strong financial position.
Interest and Fixed Charge Coverage 17x. This indicates strong ability to cover interest and fixed charges.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Operating Highlights
Development of new properties: Acquired properties in Raleigh, North Carolina, new development land in Orlando, and new buildings and land in Northeast Dallas.
Geographic and tenant diversity: Top 10 tenants now account for only 6.9% of rents, down 60 basis points from last year. Focus on geographic and tenant diversity to stabilize earnings.
Leasing performance: Quarter end leasing was 96.7% with occupancy at 95.9%. Quarterly re-leasing spreads were 36% GAAP and 22% cash. Retention rate rose to almost 80%.
Development pipeline: Re-forecasted 2025 starts to $200 million due to slower leasing pace. Limited availability of new facilities expected to put upward pressure on rents.
Financial performance: FFO per share increased by 6.6% to $2.27. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio at 2.9x, interest and fixed charge coverage at 17x. Revised FFO guidance for 2025 to $8.94-$8.98 per share.
Long-term positioning: Focus on population migration, nearshoring, onshoring, and evolving logistics chains. Upgrading tenant and geographic diversity to enhance portfolio quality.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Risk or Challenges
Occupancy Rate: Occupancy rate decreased by 100 basis points compared to the third quarter of 2024, indicating a slight decline in tenant retention and space utilization.
Development Pipeline: Leasing and maintaining projected yields in the development pipeline is progressing at a slower pace, leading to a reduction in development start projections for 2025 to $200 million.
Zoning and Permitting Challenges: Increasing difficulty in obtaining zoning and permitting for new developments, which could delay future projects and impact supply availability.
Larger Space Leasing: Larger spaces are experiencing slower leasing activity, with prospects being more deliberate, which could delay revenue generation from these spaces.
Construction Starts: Construction starts have been reduced by $15 million due to slower development leasing pace, potentially impacting future growth.
Economic Uncertainty: Signs of macroeconomic uncertainty persist, which could affect consumer and corporate confidence, impacting leasing and overall market demand.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Guidance & Outlook
Development Pipeline: Development pipeline leasing is maintaining projected yields but at a slower pace. Development start projections for 2025 have been re-forecasted to $200 million due to current demand levels. The continued decline in the supply pipeline and increasing difficulty in obtaining zoning and permitting are expected to put upward pressure on rents as demand stabilizes.
Investment Plans: The company plans to acquire properties in Raleigh, North Carolina, new development land in Orlando (where construction will begin this quarter), and new buildings and land in Northeast Dallas, a fast-growing and supply-constrained market.
FFO Guidance: FFO guidance for the fourth quarter is estimated to be in the range of $2.30 to $2.34 per share, and for the year, in the range of $8.94 to $8.98, representing increases of 7.9% and 7.3% compared to the prior year.
Same-Store Occupancy: Same-store occupancy for the fourth quarter is projected to be 97%, the highest quarter for the year. Cash same-store growth midpoint guidance has been increased by 20 basis points to 6.7%.
Tenant Collections: Tenant collections are expected to remain healthy, with uncollectible rents estimated to be in the 35- to 40-basis point range as a percentage of revenues, consistent with historical levels.
Market Trends and Positioning: The company anticipates benefiting from long-term positive secular trends such as population migration, nearshoring and onshoring trends, evolving logistics chains, and historically lower shallow bay market vacancies. These trends are expected to support portfolio growth and quality improvements.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Shareholder Return Plan
The selected topic was not discussed during the call.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Key Q&A
Q:Can you expand on leasing, especially regarding the development pipeline and the conversion to signed leases?
A:Marshall Loeb noted that conversations have improved since May, with better retention rates (almost 80% in Q3). However, the conversion to signed leases has been slower this year compared to the past five years. The company has paused its development pipeline starts multiple times and is not assuming speculative leasing for the rest of the year. They are building out spec suites to accommodate smaller spaces quickly.
Q:How have construction costs trended recently, and are they a constraint on starting more projects?
A:Construction pricing has decreased by 10-12% due to high competition for projects. However, challenges remain with obtaining transformers and electrical equipment. The company underwrites land acquisitions based on current rents and construction costs, achieving yields in the low 7% range. Demand, rather than construction costs, has been the primary factor slowing down project starts.
Q:What is the status of incremental leasing in the development pipeline, and how much availability has active prospects?
A:Incremental leasing was muted, with six leases totaling 215,000 square feet signed during the quarter. Some spaces, like Dominguez, faced delays due to subdivision and additional office components. About every building in the development pipeline has some activity, but the pace of signed leases has been slower than expected. Larger tenant pre-leases are showing promise, but they will take a few quarters to materialize.
Q:Can you comment on the overall operating portfolio and leasing volume for next year?
A:Marshall Loeb believes the company can maintain strong re-leasing spreads in the mid-30% range for next year. He highlighted low supply and a 4% vacancy rate in their markets, which could lead to another leg up in rents. However, he acknowledged that headline risks could impact leasing activity.
Q:What are the regional strengths and weaknesses in your markets?
A:The Eastern region, particularly Florida, Nashville, and Raleigh, has been strong. Texas markets like Dallas are performing well, with 100% leasing in Dallas. Arizona markets are also fully leased despite high vacancy rates. California, especially Los Angeles, and Denver have been slower, with L.A. experiencing 11 consecutive quarters of negative absorption.
Q:What is the outlook for re-leasing spreads if the current market conditions persist?
A:Marshall Loeb stated that it would take several years for re-leasing spreads to decline significantly due to the long-term nature of leases (3-10 years). Brent Wood added that supply constraints could lead to a quick market turnaround if demand improves.
Q:Is manufacturing onshoring a potential driver for industrial demand?
A:Marshall Loeb acknowledged that manufacturing onshoring and nearshoring are creating new demand sources, particularly in Texas, Arizona, and the Carolinas. The company has seen increased activity from suppliers to large manufacturing plants, which could complement their consumer-focused strategy.
Q:What is the level of bad debt and any changes in the tenant watch list?
A:Bad debt remains low at 30-35 basis points relative to total revenue, with no significant changes in the tenant watch list. The company has seen consistent tenant credit quality.
Q:At what interest rate would you consider increasing leverage levels?
A:Brent Wood mentioned that the company is considering a $200-250 million unsecured term loan at rates in the low 4% range. They have maintained low leverage (2.9x debt to EBITDA) and are monitoring public debt markets for opportunities.
Q:What is the average rent per square foot signed year-to-date, and how does it compare to 2026 expiring rents?
A:Brent Wood did not provide specific numbers but noted that rental rates have remained sticky despite moderating from their highs. He offered to provide more detailed numbers offline.
Q:What caused the acceleration in GAAP same-store NOI this quarter, and is it sustainable?
A:The acceleration was driven by strong same-store occupancy, which increased to 97% in Q4. The company expects this momentum to continue into next year, supported by an 80% retention rate and stable growth in the operating portfolio.
Q:Does the development pipeline's low pre-leasing rate affect your decision to start new projects?
A:Marshall Loeb stated that the company considers both entity-level risk and submarket activity when deciding on new starts. They aim to stay slightly ahead of demand but have slowed starts to avoid oversupply.
Q:What are your expectations for leasing costs and their impact on development leasing?
A:Leasing costs, including commissions and tenant improvements, have remained stable. The company is willing to fund more tenant improvements if credit quality is strong, but the main challenge is tenant confidence rather than leasing economics.
Q:Are there any changes in tenant credit quality or lease term preferences?
A:Brent Wood noted no significant changes in tenant credit quality or lease term preferences. The company continues to see consistent tenant profiles.
Q:What is the outlook for development starts and their impact on 2026?
A:Marshall Loeb expressed hope for $200 million in starts next year but emphasized that the pace will depend on market conditions. The company is prepared to adjust its plans based on leasing activity and demand.
Q:Review of Unclear Management Responses
A:Management avoided directly addressing the specific average rent per square foot signed year-to-date compared to 2026 expiring rents, offering to provide details offline. Additionally, while they expressed optimism about leasing prospects, they did not provide clear timelines or specific actions to address the slower-than-expected pace of development leasing.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Earnings Word Cloud
The most frequently occurring keywords in this quarter's earning call
Brent Wood
Brent topic
CEO sir
Dallas market
Instructions Friday
Loeb CEO
North Carolina
Northeast Dallas
Orlando ground
Raleigh North
Starts difficulty
Treasurer result
Webcast Instructions
agreement share
angle market
assumption Executive
capital source
cash lease
condition balance
confidence stage
consumer confidence
date rent
demand increase
development land
difficulty zoning
evaluation capital
foot angle
fundamental foot
ground building
hand investment
increase outperformance
increase prospect
increase supply
indicator tenant
interest Brent
investment perspective
land Orlando
land supply
lease term
leasing construction
leasing number
level term
prospect activity
EGP Transcript
EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Unknown10-24
The earnings call reveals mixed signals: while there is optimism about re-leasing spreads and demand from manufacturing onshoring, development leasing is slower than expected. Financial guidance shows slight improvements, but concerns remain about regional weaknesses and unclear management responses. The neutral sentiment reflects balanced positive and negative factors.
EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Unknown7-24
The earnings call reveals mixed sentiments: while there are positive aspects such as a strong balance sheet, diversified tenant base, and strategic market positioning, there are also concerns about leasing activity delays and bad debt, particularly in California. The Q&A section highlights uncertainties in development leasing and management's vague responses to certain questions. Although there are optimistic guidance and strategic market expansions, the overall sentiment remains balanced due to these concerns and lack of clear catalysts for immediate growth.
EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Unknown4-24
The earnings call presents a mixed picture. Financial performance shows resilience with a 7.1% increase in FFO per share and a strong balance sheet. However, occupancy rates have declined, and there are concerns about leasing activity, particularly in California. The Q&A reveals some management evasiveness, especially about redevelopment plans and stress test specifics, which may cause investor uncertainty. Despite strong interest coverage and strategic acquisitions, the lack of clear guidance and market uncertainties result in a neutral sentiment.
Earnings call transcript: EastGroup Properties beats Q1 2025 forecasts
Unknown4-24
The earnings call presents a mixed picture. Financial performance is strong with a 7.1% increase in FFO per share and a healthy balance sheet, but there's uncertainty in leasing, particularly in LA, and vague management responses in the Q&A. Reduced development starts and capital proceeds indicate caution. The positive aspects are offset by concerns over leasing activity and management's lack of clarity, suggesting a neutral impact on stock price.
EGP Report
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does this earnings call transcript come from?
All transcripts are sourced directly from the official live webcast or the company’s official investor relations website. We use the exact words spoken during the call with no paraphrasing of the core discussion.
How soon is the transcript available after the earnings call ends?
Full verbatim transcripts are typically published within 4–12 hours after the call ends. Same-day availability is guaranteed for all S&P 500 and most mid-cap companies.
Is the transcript edited or altered in any way?
No material content is ever changed or summarized in the “Full Transcript” section. We only correct obvious spoken typos (e.g., “um”, “ah”, repeated 10 times”, or clear misspoken ticker symbols) and add speaker names/titles for readability. Every substantive sentence remains 100% as spoken.
Why do some answers appear as “Unclear” or “Inaudible”?
When audio quality is poor or multiple speakers talk over each other, we mark the section instead of guessing. This ensures complete accuracy rather than introducing potential errors.
Who creates the AI Summary and Key Q&A highlights shown above the transcript?
They are generated by a specialized financial-language model trained exclusively on 15+ years of earnings transcripts. The model extracts financial figures, guidance, and tone with 97%+ accuracy and is regularly validated against human analysts. The full raw transcript always remains available for verification.
