Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
Access earnings results, analyst expectations, report, slides, earnings call, and transcript.
Overview
The earnings call summary shows mixed signals: strong EPS growth and strategic projects like NEOM are positive, but halting the Blue Hydrogen Project and unclear management responses raise concerns. The Q&A reveals cautious optimism, with some market recovery and cost management strategies. However, uncertainties in projects like Darrow and helium price impacts persist. Given these factors and the absence of market cap data, a neutral stock price movement is anticipated over the next two weeks.
Key Financial Performance
Adjusted Operating Income 12% improvement year-over-year, driven by broad-based growth across reporting segments.
Earnings Per Share (EPS) $3.16, up 10% year-over-year, attributed to stronger productivity despite weak economic conditions.
Operating Margin 24.4%, an increase year-over-year, attributed to business mix and non-helium pricing actions.
Return on Capital (ROC) 11%, slightly lower than last year but stable sequentially, reflecting ongoing execution on project backlog.
Sales (Americas) Up 4% year-over-year, driven by higher energy pass-through and offset by prior year nonrecurring items and fixed cost inflation.
Sales (Asia) Up 2% year-over-year, driven by productivity and reduced depreciation from certain gasification assets held for sale, partially offset by lower helium.
Sales (Europe) Increased year-over-year due to volume and price as well as favorable currency, with higher costs associated with depreciation and fixed cost inflation.
Operating Income (Middle East and India) Improved year-over-year due to lower costs, while equity affiliate income remained flat.
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio 2.2x, reflecting consolidation of the joint venture's investment in the NEOM Green Hydrogen Project during the construction phase.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Operating Highlights
Liquid Hydrogen Supply Contracts: Air Products announced new supply contracts with NASA to provide liquid hydrogen to multiple U.S. facilities.
New Assets Contribution: Modest contributions from new assets in Asia, expected to ramp up further in the second half of the fiscal year.
Low-Emission Ammonia Projects: Advanced negotiations with Yara International for projects in Saudi Arabia and the U.S., focusing on renewable ammonia and hydrogen production.
Geographic Expansion: Collaboration with Yara International to distribute renewable ammonia in Europe and execute a 25-year hydrogen and nitrogen supply agreement in the U.S.
Earnings Growth: Achieved 12% improvement in adjusted operating income and 10% growth in EPS, driven by pricing actions, productivity, and new assets.
Capital Discipline: Reduced capital expenditures by $1 billion for fiscal 2026, with heavy CapEx periods expected to decline after projects in Canada and the Netherlands go on stream.
Operational Efficiency: Improved operating margin to 24.4% and implemented productivity actions to offset fixed cost inflation and maintenance costs.
Focus on Core Industrial Gas Business: Refocused operations by canceling projects, optimizing headcount, and rationalizing assets.
Clean Energy Projects: Prioritized descoping and derisking clean energy projects, including the Louisiana project with Yara International.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Risk or Challenges
Helium supply challenges: Continued helium headwinds, including prior year nonrecurring helium sale, are limiting volume growth and impacting financial performance.
Macroeconomic environment: Sluggish macroeconomic conditions are creating uncertainties and limiting volume growth for the fiscal year.
Capital expenditure risks: Fiscal 2026 and early 2027 are heavy CapEx periods for clean energy projects, which could strain financial resources and require disciplined capital allocation.
Regulatory risks: Potential changes in CBAM tariffs in Europe could indirectly affect the Louisiana project, though Yara bears the regulatory risk.
Project execution risks: The Louisiana project requires reliable capital cost estimates, reputable EPC agreements, and a partner for carbon capture and sequestration to meet return requirements.
Energy cost pass-through: Higher energy cost pass-through in the Americas is creating a 50 basis point headwind on operating margins.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Guidance & Outlook
Full Year Earnings Guidance: Air Products is affirming its full year earnings guidance, which implies an improvement of 7% to 9% at the midpoint for the full fiscal year. EPS growth is expected to be achieved primarily through continued focus on pricing actions, productivity, and new assets contribution.
Capital Expenditures: The company expects to reduce its capital expenditures by approximately $1 billion in fiscal 2026. Fiscal 2026 and the first part of 2027 are heavy CapEx periods for clean energy projects in Canada and the Netherlands, with a significant decline expected after these projects go on stream.
Dividend Increase: The Board has authorized an increase in the dividend, marking the 44th consecutive year of dividend increases.
Low-Emission Ammonia Projects: Air Products is in advanced negotiations with Yara International for low-emission ammonia projects in Saudi Arabia and the U.S. The collaboration aims to connect Air Products' industrial gas expertise with Yara's ammonia supply network. The agreement for the Saudi Arabia project is expected to be finalized in the first half of 2026.
Louisiana Project: The company is negotiating for Yara to acquire ammonia production and distribution assets from the Louisiana project and execute a 25-year hydrogen and nitrogen supply agreement. Air Products is also seeking a partner for carbon capture and sequestration scope and expects to have a reliable capital cost estimate in the next few months.
Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Guidance: Earnings per share for the second quarter of 2026 are expected to be in the range of $2.95 to $3.10, representing a 10% to 15% improvement from the prior year. Growth is expected from pricing actions and productivity, partially offset by lower helium.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Shareholder Return Plan
Dividend Increase: The Board has authorized an increase in the company's dividend, marking the 44th consecutive year of dividend increases.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Key Q&A
Q:You're targeting double-digit return on the go-forward CapEx, how should we think about the returns on the $2 billion of capital already invested in the project? And is the 45Q credit included in the double-digit return on a go-forward CapEx?
A:The 45Q credit is included in the return and will be taken by Air Products. The return is calculated on a go-forward basis, and no further details were disclosed.
Q:Could you talk about how much the continuing helium business is still down and the headwind for Q2 and the rest of the year?
A:The helium business saw better-than-expected performance in the last quarter, particularly in the Aerospace segment in the Americas. However, the company forecasts a 4% EPS effect down for the year.
Q:What was the benefit from moving gasification plants in China to 'for sale' and the expectation for timing and proceeds?
A:The benefit was about 1% of overall results for the quarter. Negotiations for selling the assets are ongoing, and the company expects to complete the sale within the fiscal year.
Q:Is Air Products receiving income from Gulf Coast ammonia, and how much was invested in the project? What assets does Air Products own?
A:Air Products is in the process of starting the plant, which has been running at 80-90% capacity. The company owns the SMR, hydrogen production, and air separation plant, while the customer owns the ammonia production and tank. Investment details were not disclosed but can be provided offline.
Q:What was the impact of the sale of equipment cost overrun this quarter compared to last year?
A:The impact was about $30 million this quarter, comparable to last year. This is part of percent-of-completion accounting and reflects the best estimate of future costs.
Q:Can you unpack the margin improvement seen in the Americas, given the volume drop of 4%?
A:The margin improvement was driven by strong on-site volumes, price increases across products (excluding helium), and ongoing cost productivity efforts. Costs were slightly negative compared to the prior year.
Q:Can you provide an update on the Alberta project in terms of potential offtakes, construction timing, and costs?
A:The project remains on track with an estimated cost of $3.3 billion and startup in early 2018. Negotiations with potential offtakers are ongoing, but no definitive updates were provided.
Q:How much of the $2 billion spent on Darrow could be recovered if the project does not move forward?
A:The recovery estimate is about 50%, but this is uncertain and depends on negotiations and the market value of the assets. Some assets are specific to the project and may have limited market value.
Q:Is the mid-year decision on Darrow firm, or could it be delayed due to CBAM uncertainty?
A:The goal is to make a decision by mid-year, but this is not 100% firm. The main focus is on ensuring capital cost certainty. CBAM's impact is considered indirect and low probability.
Q:Can you discuss the opportunity in the space segment and growth outlook?
A:Air Products has a 40-50% market share in the U.S. space segment, with projected sales growth of 6-7% per year. The company has been a key supplier since the 1960s and continues to focus on this market.
Q:Are European volumes showing recovery, or should we remain cautious?
A:European volumes are up 5% year-on-year, partly due to lapping turnarounds from last year. However, the company remains cautious due to the complicated economic environment.
Q:How do you see pricing and cost trends progressing throughout the year?
A:The company expects similar results in pricing and productivity gains as seen in the first quarter. Helium remains a headwind, but tools are in place to manage costs and pricing effectively.
Q:How should we think about growth in electronics and specialty gases?
A:Electronics is a high-growth segment with increasing project sizes and accelerated investment decisions. Air Products is executing large projects and expects significant contributions in the back half of the year.
Q:What is the expected timing and financial impact of the NEOM deconsolidation?
A:The deconsolidation is expected in mid-2027 when the joint venture becomes operational. Debt will move off the balance sheet, and operating costs will increase slightly before deconsolidation.
Q:What was the sequential price change for helium, and how did it impact Asia?
A:Helium prices decreased by 1% globally, with Asia being the most impacted region. Without helium, Asia's prices would have been slightly positive.
Q:What caused the sequential margin decline in Europe, and what is the outlook?
A:The decline was due to higher depreciation, fixed cost inflation, and wage inflation. Seasonality also played a role. The company continues to focus on productivity improvements.
Q:What portion of customers are running below take-or-pay minimums, and is this most pronounced in Europe?
A:The company does not disclose specific figures but notes some cases in Europe. Utilization rates are in the mid-to-high 70s across regions.
Q:Is Section 27 a key issue for CBAM, and what is the next step?
A:Section 27 is part of the EU regulatory process and must be approved. Changes to CBAM would require adjustments to the entire CO2 ETS scheme, which is considered low probability.
Q:Is contracting for new electric power an issue for new ASU business in the U.S.?
A:Increased power costs are being managed through sophisticated procurement processes. Costs are passed through to customers in on-site contracts and merchant products.
Q:Is there any dependency between NEOM and Yara at Darrow, and are CBAM risks similar?
A:There is no dependency between the two projects. CBAM risks are considered indirect and low probability for both projects.
Q:What is the expected run rate contribution of the NEOM JV, and will it be at a loss initially?
A:The NEOM JV is not expected to operate at a loss, but specific financial details were not disclosed.
Q:How does Air Products view the decision-making process for Darrow and potential delays?
A:The company sees two outcomes: not proceeding or moving forward with a good project. The decision will depend on capital cost certainty and partner agreements.
Q:Did Air Products bid on the AM Green project in India, and why or why not?
A:The company did not comment on bidding but noted skepticism about the economics of green ammonia projects in India due to high power costs.
Q:How does Air Products plan to execute the Darrow project with multiple EPCs?
A:The company is exploring various execution strategies but has not disclosed specific plans.
Q:How will AI-related productivity benefits be distributed across business segments?
A:Benefits depend on the application. Cost savings in power consumption may be shared with customers, while SG&A and engineering efficiencies are internal.
Q:Review of Unclear Management Responses
A:Management avoided providing specific details on the returns of the $2 billion already invested in the Darrow project, the exact investment in Gulf Coast ammonia, and the financial details of the NEOM JV. Additionally, they did not disclose the portion of customers running below take-or-pay minimums or specific plans for executing the Darrow project with multiple EPCs.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Earnings Word Cloud
The most frequently occurring keywords in this quarter's earning call
Arabia collaboration
Arabia detail
Arabia negotiation
Britt statement
CBAM change
CBAM effect
CBAM rule
CBAM tariff
CO transport
Canada
Chief
Conference
FID
Investor Relations
Officer
Saudi Arabia
Yara International
capital cost
cost estimate
discipline
distribution
emission project
expertise
gas project
hydrogen nitrogen
negotiation Yara
production
project capital
project portfolio
requirement
risk uncertainty
scope
statement expectation
supply
track
week
APD Transcript
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
Unknown1-30
The earnings call summary shows mixed signals: strong EPS growth and strategic projects like NEOM are positive, but halting the Blue Hydrogen Project and unclear management responses raise concerns. The Q&A reveals cautious optimism, with some market recovery and cost management strategies. However, uncertainties in projects like Darrow and helium price impacts persist. Given these factors and the absence of market cap data, a neutral stock price movement is anticipated over the next two weeks.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) Presents at Citigroup 2025 Basic Materials Conference Transcript
Neutral12-2
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Unknown11-7
The earnings call presents a mixed outlook. While there are positive developments such as growth in equity affiliate income and expansion in electronics, there are concerns about macroeconomic headwinds, unclear guidance on key projects, and increased CapEx forecasts. The lack of specific guidance and potential project delays balance out the positive aspects, leading to a neutral sentiment.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Unknown7-31
The earnings call presents a mixed outlook. Positive aspects include ongoing partnerships, strong demand for clean ammonia, and a focus on cost opportunities. However, there are concerns about helium price impacts, underperforming projects, and vague responses on inflation and pricing. The company's strategic focus on core business and cash neutrality is positive, but the lack of clarity on certain financial metrics and inflationary pressures tempers the overall sentiment.
APD Slides
APD Report
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does this earnings call transcript come from?
All transcripts are sourced directly from the official live webcast or the company’s official investor relations website. We use the exact words spoken during the call with no paraphrasing of the core discussion.
How soon is the transcript available after the earnings call ends?
Full verbatim transcripts are typically published within 4–12 hours after the call ends. Same-day availability is guaranteed for all S&P 500 and most mid-cap companies.
Is the transcript edited or altered in any way?
No material content is ever changed or summarized in the “Full Transcript” section. We only correct obvious spoken typos (e.g., “um”, “ah”, repeated 10 times”, or clear misspoken ticker symbols) and add speaker names/titles for readability. Every substantive sentence remains 100% as spoken.
Why do some answers appear as “Unclear” or “Inaudible”?
When audio quality is poor or multiple speakers talk over each other, we mark the section instead of guessing. This ensures complete accuracy rather than introducing potential errors.
Who creates the AI Summary and Key Q&A highlights shown above the transcript?
They are generated by a specialized financial-language model trained exclusively on 15+ years of earnings transcripts. The model extracts financial figures, guidance, and tone with 97%+ accuracy and is regularly validated against human analysts. The full raw transcript always remains available for verification.
