Sow Good Inc. (SOWG) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Revenue $1.6 million in Q3 2025 compared to $3.6 million in Q3 2024, a decrease primarily due to lower average selling prices associated with the closeout of discontinued SKUs.
Gross Loss $8.9 million in Q3 2025 compared to a gross profit of $0.6 million in Q3 2024, primarily due to approximately $8.5 million in noncash charges to inventory associated with discontinued SKUs.
Gross Margin Negative 576% in Q3 2025 compared to 16% in Q3 2024, driven by noncash inventory charges related to discontinued SKUs.
Operating Expenses $3.7 million in Q3 2025 compared to $3.8 million in Q3 2024, a slight improvement due to lower payroll costs and professional fees.
Net Loss $10.9 million or negative $0.90 per diluted share in Q3 2025 compared to $3.4 million or negative $0.33 per diluted share in Q3 2024, largely due to lower revenues and noncash inventory reserve charges, partially offset by a noncash gain of $1.7 million from the exit of 2 leases.
Adjusted EBITDA Negative $10.9 million in Q3 2025 compared to negative $1.9 million in Q3 2024, predominantly due to inventory charges, partially offset by increased noncash compensation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents $387,300 as of Q3 2025 compared to $3.7 million as of December 31, 2024, reflecting a decrease in liquidity.
Get Free Real-Time Notifications for Any Stock
Analyst Views on SOWG
About SOWG
About the author

Minnesota ICE Agent Shooting Investigation Blocked by FBI
- Investigation Cooperation Halted: The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension has been forced to withdraw from the investigation into the fatal shooting by an ICE agent due to a lack of cooperation from federal officials, raising concerns about transparency and fairness in the inquiry.
- Federal Charges Controversy: The Department of Homeland Security accused the 37-year-old victim, Renee Good, of domestic terrorism for allegedly attempting to run down ICE agents with her SUV, a claim that has been vehemently opposed by Minnesota's governor and other Democrats, who argue that video evidence contradicts the official narrative.
- Jurisdictional Dispute: DHS Secretary stated that the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension has no jurisdiction in this investigation, further escalating tensions between local and federal law enforcement agencies and impacting public trust in the integrity of law enforcement.
- Public Safety Commitment: The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension expressed readiness to re-engage in a joint investigation if federal authorities reconsider their approach, highlighting the local agency's desire for a transparent investigation to ensure public safety.










