Thursday's ETF Movers: IHF, SPXL
Healthcare ETF Performance: The iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF is up approximately 1.8%, with Molina Healthcare and Centene showing significant gains of 6.8% and 4.8%, respectively.
S&P 500 Bull ETF Decline: The Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF is down about 12.1%, with Dell Technologies and Best Buy experiencing declines of 17.5% and 16.9%.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Analyst Views on SPXL
About the author
Leveraged ETFs Pose Risks, Yet They Are Performing Well This Year
Leveraged ETFs Overview: Leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) aim to amplify stock market movements, potentially doubling or tripling returns.
Current Performance: These funds have been performing well in the current year, meeting their promised returns.
Complicated Mechanics: The operational complexity of leveraged ETFs can lead to unpredictable outcomes.
Long-term Investment Risks: Due to their mechanics, leveraged ETFs are generally considered unreliable for long-term investors.
QLD vs. SPXL: Which is More Beneficial for Investors—Tech-Focused Growth or S&P 500 Diversification?
Performance Comparison: QLD has delivered slightly higher one-year total returns than SPXL, but both funds exhibit similar extreme drawdown risks and volatility, with SPXL offering broader diversification across over 500 stocks compared to QLD's concentrated tech focus.
Fund Characteristics: SPXL aims to triple the daily performance of the S&P 500, while QLD targets double the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100, leading to different risk-reward profiles; SPXL's higher leverage can result in greater returns but also steeper losses.
Sector Allocation: QLD allocates 55% of its assets to technology, with significant holdings in major tech companies like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, whereas SPXL has a more diversified sector exposure, which can help mitigate volatility.
Investment Considerations: Investors should choose between QLD for targeted tech exposure and SPXL for broader S&P 500 exposure, keeping in mind the higher expense ratios and the nature of leveraged funds that amplify both gains and losses.
SPXL vs. SSO: Are the Significant Fluctuations of These Leveraged ETFs Beneficial for Investors? Essential Insights You Should Consider
Leverage Comparison: SPXL offers triple leverage on daily S&P 500 movements, while SSO provides double leverage, resulting in higher potential gains and losses for SPXL compared to SSO.
Volatility and Risk: SPXL has experienced deeper historical drawdowns and greater volatility than SSO, indicating a bumpier investment ride, especially during market corrections.
Performance Metrics: Over the past five years, SPXL has significantly outperformed SSO, tripling in value, although its total returns over the last year have only marginally surpassed those of SSO.
Investment Considerations: Both ETFs are designed for short-term trading, and investors must weigh the potential for higher returns against the increased risk and volatility associated with SPXL.
ETF Movers on Tuesday: KRE, SPXL
State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF Performance: The ETF is up about 0.8% on Tuesday, with notable gains from Eagle Bancorp (up 4%) and Firstsun Capital Bancorp (up 2.5%).
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF Performance: This ETF is down approximately 2.9%, with Western Digital and Micron Technology showing significant declines of 6.3% and 5.5%, respectively.
Market Overview: The trading day highlights contrasting performances between regional banking and broader market ETFs.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in the article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Nasdaq, Inc.
QLD and SPXL Provide Unique Leverage Opportunities for Growth Investors
Leveraged ETFs Overview: QLD and SPXL are leveraged ETFs that aim to provide amplified returns, with QLD targeting double the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 and SPXL aiming for triple the daily performance of the S&P 500.
Performance Comparison: Over the past five years, SPXL has outperformed QLD with a total return of 366% compared to QLD's 252%, both significantly exceeding the S&P 500's 123% return.
Sector Focus and Holdings: QLD has a tech-heavy portfolio with 54% in technology, while SPXL has a more diversified range of stocks, with both funds employing daily leverage resets that can impact long-term returns.
Investment Risks: Both funds come with high fees and extreme volatility, having experienced drawdowns exceeding 60% in the last five years, highlighting the risks associated with leveraged investments.
TQQQ and SPXL: A Comparison of Tech Concentration and Overall Market Performance
ETF Overview: ProShares - UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) are leveraged ETFs that aim to deliver 3x daily returns, with TQQQ focusing on the tech-heavy Nasdaq-100 and SPXL tracking the broader S&P 500.
Risk and Volatility: Both ETFs carry similar expense ratios and dividend yields, but TQQQ has a higher beta, indicating greater price volatility, particularly due to its significant exposure to the technology sector.
Investment Considerations: Investors should be aware of the higher risks associated with these leveraged ETFs, including potential severe fluctuations in the short term, and should consider maintaining a diversified portfolio and a long-term investment strategy.
Key Definitions: Important terms related to ETFs include daily leverage reset, beta (volatility measure), expense ratio (operating costs), and assets under management (total market value of fund assets).
Leveraged ETFs Pose Risks, Yet They Are Performing Well This Year
Leveraged ETFs Overview: Leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) aim to amplify stock market movements, potentially doubling or tripling returns.
Current Performance: These funds have been performing well in the current year, meeting their promised returns.
Complicated Mechanics: The operational complexity of leveraged ETFs can lead to unpredictable outcomes.
Long-term Investment Risks: Due to their mechanics, leveraged ETFs are generally considered unreliable for long-term investors.
QLD vs. SPXL: Which is More Beneficial for Investors—Tech-Focused Growth or S&P 500 Diversification?
Performance Comparison: QLD has delivered slightly higher one-year total returns than SPXL, but both funds exhibit similar extreme drawdown risks and volatility, with SPXL offering broader diversification across over 500 stocks compared to QLD's concentrated tech focus.
Fund Characteristics: SPXL aims to triple the daily performance of the S&P 500, while QLD targets double the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100, leading to different risk-reward profiles; SPXL's higher leverage can result in greater returns but also steeper losses.
Sector Allocation: QLD allocates 55% of its assets to technology, with significant holdings in major tech companies like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, whereas SPXL has a more diversified sector exposure, which can help mitigate volatility.
Investment Considerations: Investors should choose between QLD for targeted tech exposure and SPXL for broader S&P 500 exposure, keeping in mind the higher expense ratios and the nature of leveraged funds that amplify both gains and losses.
SPXL vs. SSO: Are the Significant Fluctuations of These Leveraged ETFs Beneficial for Investors? Essential Insights You Should Consider
Leverage Comparison: SPXL offers triple leverage on daily S&P 500 movements, while SSO provides double leverage, resulting in higher potential gains and losses for SPXL compared to SSO.
Volatility and Risk: SPXL has experienced deeper historical drawdowns and greater volatility than SSO, indicating a bumpier investment ride, especially during market corrections.
Performance Metrics: Over the past five years, SPXL has significantly outperformed SSO, tripling in value, although its total returns over the last year have only marginally surpassed those of SSO.
Investment Considerations: Both ETFs are designed for short-term trading, and investors must weigh the potential for higher returns against the increased risk and volatility associated with SPXL.
ETF Movers on Tuesday: KRE, SPXL
State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF Performance: The ETF is up about 0.8% on Tuesday, with notable gains from Eagle Bancorp (up 4%) and Firstsun Capital Bancorp (up 2.5%).
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF Performance: This ETF is down approximately 2.9%, with Western Digital and Micron Technology showing significant declines of 6.3% and 5.5%, respectively.
Market Overview: The trading day highlights contrasting performances between regional banking and broader market ETFs.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in the article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Nasdaq, Inc.
QLD and SPXL Provide Unique Leverage Opportunities for Growth Investors
Leveraged ETFs Overview: QLD and SPXL are leveraged ETFs that aim to provide amplified returns, with QLD targeting double the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 and SPXL aiming for triple the daily performance of the S&P 500.
Performance Comparison: Over the past five years, SPXL has outperformed QLD with a total return of 366% compared to QLD's 252%, both significantly exceeding the S&P 500's 123% return.
Sector Focus and Holdings: QLD has a tech-heavy portfolio with 54% in technology, while SPXL has a more diversified range of stocks, with both funds employing daily leverage resets that can impact long-term returns.
Investment Risks: Both funds come with high fees and extreme volatility, having experienced drawdowns exceeding 60% in the last five years, highlighting the risks associated with leveraged investments.
TQQQ and SPXL: A Comparison of Tech Concentration and Overall Market Performance
ETF Overview: ProShares - UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) are leveraged ETFs that aim to deliver 3x daily returns, with TQQQ focusing on the tech-heavy Nasdaq-100 and SPXL tracking the broader S&P 500.
Risk and Volatility: Both ETFs carry similar expense ratios and dividend yields, but TQQQ has a higher beta, indicating greater price volatility, particularly due to its significant exposure to the technology sector.
Investment Considerations: Investors should be aware of the higher risks associated with these leveraged ETFs, including potential severe fluctuations in the short term, and should consider maintaining a diversified portfolio and a long-term investment strategy.
Key Definitions: Important terms related to ETFs include daily leverage reset, beta (volatility measure), expense ratio (operating costs), and assets under management (total market value of fund assets).
