TMQ Should I Buy
-
$
0.000
0.000(0.000%)
At close0.000(0.000%)Aft-market
ET
Loading...
TMQ is not a good buy right now for an impatient investor. The stock just had a sharp -16% regular-session drawdown, broke below near-term support (~5.23), MACD downside momentum is expanding, and the news flow is currently sector-negative (U.S. critical-minerals price-support policy reversal). Despite mildly constructive longer-term moving averages and somewhat bullish options open interest positioning, near-term probabilities and catalysts skew lower—this is better treated as an avoid/hold until price stabilizes back above ~5.23–6.09.
Price/Trend: Large downside shock (-16.14% regular session; post-market ~5.08). The stock is trading below S1 (5.233), with the next support at S2 (4.704). A reclaim of Pivot (6.089) would be needed to repair the chart. Momentum: MACD histogram -0.0188 and negatively expanding = bearish momentum accelerating. RSI(6) ~30.6 is near oversold, which can spark bounces, but it is not a standalone buy signal while MACD is worsening. Moving Averages: SMA_5 > SMA_20 > SMA_200 is structurally bullish, but the current price action indicates a short-term breakdown despite that longer-term alignment. Pattern-based forward read: Similar-pattern stats imply a 70% chance of further downside (next day -6.28%, next week -2.33%, next month -2.39%), reinforcing a near-term bearish bias.
Intellectia Proprietary Trading Signals
is still technically constructive if price can reclaim 5.23 and then 6.
Broader U.S. strategic interest in domestic critical minerals/rare earth supply chains remains a thematic tailwind for the space (even if current policy headlines are mixed).
and momentum (MACD) is deteriorating, raising risk of a move toward S2 (~4.70).
Latest quarter: 2025/Q3. The company remains pre-revenue (revenue reported as 0). Net loss improved modestly YoY (net income -$1.747M, +9.81% YoY improvement), and EPS stayed around -$0.01. Overall, this is still an early-stage/pre-cash-flow profile; the investment case is driven more by funding/policy/commodity-cycle catalysts than operating growth trends.
No analyst rating or price target change data was provided, so a definitive trend can’t be confirmed here. Wall Street-style pros: exposure to critical minerals theme; any supportive U.S. industrial policy/funding can re-rate developers. Cons: pre-revenue financial profile; high sensitivity to policy headlines and financing conditions; current news flow is unfavorable and the chart is in a short-term breakdown.
