Loading...
Access earnings results, analyst expectations, report, slides, earnings call, and transcript.
The earnings call reveals several concerns: an EPS miss, significant operating and net losses, and uncertainty over DOE funding. Despite revenue growth and strong liquidity, the company faces macro challenges and a competitive landscape shift. The Q&A session highlighted unclear management responses on tariffs and strategic focus. Although there are positive elements like partnerships and revenue growth, the overall sentiment is negative due to financial underperformance and strategic uncertainties.
Revenue $20.1 million, a $2.7 million or 16% increase compared to 2023 revenue of $17.4 million. This increase was driven primarily by the SK On agreements with strong execution on the line installation agreement and completion of key steps in the transfer of our technology accounting for $11.8 million of our 2024 revenue.
Operating Expenses $125.5 million, an increase of $17.5 million compared to 2023. This increase was driven by higher research and development costs to improve the performance of our electrolyte and cell designs, electrolyte production, equipment purchases in support of the SK On agreements and scaling of operations, including establishing Korean operations.
Operating Loss $105.3 million, reflecting the increased operating expenses.
Net Loss $96.5 million or $0.54 per share, resulting from the operating loss.
Capital Expenditures $15.9 million, primarily investments in electrolyte development and production capabilities, including the build out of the Electrolyte Innovation Center.
Total Cash Investment $79.8 million, which was below the guidance range of $100 million to $120 million, due to prioritizing projects and outlays to preserve cash runway while still meeting goals and objectives.
Total Liquidity $327.5 million at the end of the year, reflecting the lower cash investment.
Electrolyte Development: Increased electrolyte sampling activity, including to new potential customers, and opened the Electrolyte Innovation Center (EIC).
Cell Development: Continued collaboration with BMW and Ford on cell development, extending joint development agreements.
Market Expansion: Expanded presence in Korea, establishing a home base for engagement with potential customers and vendors.
Partnerships: Deepened relationship with SK On through multiple agreements to support solid state cell development.
Operational Efficiency: Commissioned the EIC to develop and test production processes at a smaller scale before transferring to pilot manufacturing lines.
Production Capabilities: Increased production capabilities and robust customer sampling to drive commercialization of electrolyte.
Strategic Shift: Focus on supplying electrolyte to Tier 1 cell manufacturers rather than competing in cell production.
Funding and Investment: Selected for a $50 million DOE grant to install a continuous manufacturing process for sulfide-based solid electrolytes.
Earnings Miss: Solid Power, Inc. reported an EPS of $-0.16, missing expectations of $-0.13.
Market Conditions: The company faced a difficult macro environment with slower-than-expected EV sales and many OEMs projecting commercial adoption of solid-state batteries in the late 2020s or early 2030s.
Funding Uncertainty: There is uncertainty regarding the timing of funding under the DOE agreement due to a January 2025 executive order that paused disbursements of funds pending further review.
Operating Loss: Solid Power reported an operating loss of $105.3 million and a net loss of $96.5 million for 2024.
Capital Expenditure Guidance: For 2025, the company expects cash investment to be in the range of $100 million to $120 million, which reflects ongoing financial discipline amid market signals.
Competitive Landscape: The company is focusing on electrolyte development while scaling back on internal cell development, which may impact its competitive positioning in the solid-state battery market.
Electrolyte Innovation Center (EIC): Opened a state-of-the-art Electrolyte Innovation Center to develop and test production processes.
Partnerships with SK On, BMW, and Ford: Deepened relationships with SK On, BMW, and Ford through various agreements to support solid state cell development.
Continuous Manufacturing Process: Selected for a $50 million DOE grant to install a continuous manufacturing process for sulfide-based solid electrolyte materials.
Korean Operations Expansion: Expanded presence in Korea to engage with potential customers and vendors.
Electrolyte Sampling Program: Increased electrolyte sampling to new and repeat customers, primarily Asian Tier 1 manufacturers.
2025 Revenue Expectations: Expect revenue to be consistent with or higher than 2024's $20.1 million.
2025 Cash Investment Guidance: Expect cash investment to be in the range of $100 million to $120 million, excluding DOE grant benefits.
Capital Expenditures: Significant capital expenditures in 2025 will relate to facility engineering and construction of a third pilot electrolyte line.
Financial Discipline: Maintain financial discipline while investing in technology development and production capabilities.
Shareholder Return Plan: None
Despite a new partnership with Samsung SDI and BMW, the company faces significant financial challenges, including a revenue decline and high operating losses. The reduced cash investment guidance reflects fiscal discipline, but ongoing reliance on partnerships and manufacturing risks present uncertainties. With no guidance provided, the market may react negatively.
The earnings call summary shows mixed indicators: a slight revenue increase and reduced operating expenses, but ongoing net losses and uncertainties in revenue trajectory beyond 2025. Partnerships with major companies and a DOE grant are positives, but supply chain and competitive pressures pose risks. The Q&A reveals unclear guidance on future revenue, which adds to uncertainty. Given these mixed signals and the absence of clear catalysts for strong movement, the stock price is likely to remain stable in the short term, resulting in a neutral sentiment.
The earnings call reveals several concerns: an EPS miss, significant operating and net losses, and uncertainty over DOE funding. Despite revenue growth and strong liquidity, the company faces macro challenges and a competitive landscape shift. The Q&A session highlighted unclear management responses on tariffs and strategic focus. Although there are positive elements like partnerships and revenue growth, the overall sentiment is negative due to financial underperformance and strategic uncertainties.
The earnings call summary shows a mix of positive and negative aspects. Positive elements include partnerships with major companies and a DOE grant. However, the company faces challenges with a difficult macro environment, funding uncertainties, and competitive pressures. The Q&A reveals management's focus on core business and diversification, but vague responses on tariffs raise concerns. Despite a 16% revenue increase, significant losses and operational challenges are evident. The overall sentiment is balanced, leading to a neutral prediction for stock price movement.
All transcripts are sourced directly from the official live webcast or the company’s official investor relations website. We use the exact words spoken during the call with no paraphrasing of the core discussion.
Full verbatim transcripts are typically published within 4–12 hours after the call ends. Same-day availability is guaranteed for all S&P 500 and most mid-cap companies.
No material content is ever changed or summarized in the “Full Transcript” section. We only correct obvious spoken typos (e.g., “um”, “ah”, repeated 10 times”, or clear misspoken ticker symbols) and add speaker names/titles for readability. Every substantive sentence remains 100% as spoken.
When audio quality is poor or multiple speakers talk over each other, we mark the section instead of guessing. This ensures complete accuracy rather than introducing potential errors.
They are generated by a specialized financial-language model trained exclusively on 15+ years of earnings transcripts. The model extracts financial figures, guidance, and tone with 97%+ accuracy and is regularly validated against human analysts. The full raw transcript always remains available for verification.