Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
Access earnings results, analyst expectations, report, slides, earnings call, and transcript.
Overview
The earnings call shows mixed signals: solid operational efficiency and strategic share repurchases are offset by challenges like lower EBITDA and unclear guidance on key issues such as Hawaii's product lag reversal. The Q&A highlights uncertainties, especially in pricing dynamics and throughput guidance, which tempers optimism. Despite strategic initiatives and shareholder value focus, the lack of clear guidance and current market dynamics suggest a neutral stock price movement over the next two weeks for this mid-cap company.
Key Financial Performance
Adjusted EBITDA $91 million, a decrease compared to $88 million in the fourth quarter. Reasons include lower fuel margins in the Retail segment and a net price lag headwind in Hawaii.
Adjusted Net Income $39 million or $0.78 per share. Reasons include the lag effect of rising crude and distillate prices in Hawaii and off-season conditions in Wyoming and Montana.
Retail Segment Same-Store Fuel Sales Decreased by 3.3% year-over-year. Reasons include shifting consumer refueling patterns due to rising flat price environment and Hawaii flooding events causing state-level closures.
Retail Segment Same-Store In-Store Sales Decreased by 1% year-over-year. Reasons include shifting consumer refueling patterns and Hawaii flooding events causing state-level closures.
Hawaii Refining Throughput Record 90,000 barrels per day. Reasons include strong operational performance and prebuilding inventory ahead of planned maintenance outages.
Montana Refining Throughput 57,000 barrels per day. Reasons include efficient operations and operational expenditure control.
Wyoming Refining Throughput 15,000 barrels per day. Reasons include lower seasonal throughput and routine maintenance outages.
Washington Refining Throughput 23,000 barrels per day. Reasons include reduced rates due to February planned downtime.
Hawaii Production Costs $4.67 per barrel. Reasons include operational efficiency and throughput performance.
Montana Production Costs $9.05 per barrel. Reasons include efficient operations and operational expenditure control.
Wyoming Production Costs $11.68 per barrel. Reasons include lower seasonal throughput and routine maintenance outages.
Washington Production Costs $7.53 per barrel. Reasons include reduced rates due to February planned downtime.
Retail Segment Adjusted EBITDA $15 million, a decrease compared to $22 million in the fourth quarter. Reasons include lower fuel margins reflecting rapid increases in wholesale prices.
Logistics Segment Adjusted EBITDA $32 million, in line with mid-cycle run rate. Reasons include strong system utilization in Hawaii and Montana, offset by reduced crude activity in Washington during planned turnaround.
Capital Expenditures $61 million, including deferred turnaround costs. Reasons include planned maintenance and operational investments.
Share Repurchases $28 million during the quarter at an average price of $38 per share. Reasons include strategic capital allocation and shareholder value enhancement.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Operating Highlights
Hawaii Renewables Unit: Successfully started up, marking a significant step for the renewables business. The unit is being tested and optimized, with a focus on establishing credit pathways. Achieved on-specification renewable diesel in late April and transitioning operations to validate sustainable aviation fuel mode.
Refined product cracks in Asia: Surged to all-time highs due to reduced Persian Gulf exports, aging refiners reducing run rates, and protectionist policies. April Singapore 3-1-2 index averaged over $72 per barrel, significantly above historical norms.
First quarter throughput: Set a record with 184,000 barrels per day across the system. Hawaii achieved a record 90,000 barrels per day, and Montana achieved a record winter season throughput.
Maintenance and operational readiness: Wyoming and Montana facilities completed April outages on time and are prepared for summer operations. Washington completed February turnaround and is operating at maximum rates.
Capital allocation: Repurchased $28 million in shares during the quarter at an average price of $38 per share. Total liquidity position of $938 million supports strategic objectives and share repurchase framework.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Risk or Challenges
Lag effect of rising crude and distillate prices in Hawaii: The lag effect of rapidly rising crude and distillate prices in Hawaii negatively impacted financial performance, creating a headwind of approximately $125 million.
Decreased same-store sales in Retail segment: Quarterly same-store fuel and in-store sales decreased by 3.3% and 1%, respectively, due to shifting consumer refueling patterns and the impact of state-level closures caused by Hawaii flooding events.
Hawaii refinery turnaround: The planned turnaround in Hawaii, expected to last 30-45 days, will result in reduced throughput and the renewable fuels unit being offline, impacting production and financial performance.
Price lag in Hawaii refinery operations: The Hawaii refinery's contractual sales structure caused a price lag, leading to adjusted gross margin trailing current market conditions during periods of sharp price increases.
Retail segment margin pressure: Lower fuel margins in the Retail segment were driven by rapid increases in wholesale prices, reducing profitability.
Supply chain disruptions in Washington: Reduced crude activity in Washington during the planned turnaround negatively impacted logistics segment performance.
Economic impact of Hawaii flooding: Flooding events in Hawaii caused state-level closures, disrupting operations and reducing sales in the Retail segment.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Guidance & Outlook
Global refined product inventory and market conditions: Global refined product inventory buffers are drawing down aggressively, setting up for meaningful tightness over the summer months. Many Asian refiners are running at near minimum throughput rates, attempting to preserve crude supply chain duration versus maximizing profits.
Hawaii Renewables Unit: The Hawaii Renewables Unit has started successfully, and the company is focused on testing and optimizing unit operations while establishing credit pathways. The policy backdrop is strengthening, and the outlook for the project remains constructive. The renewable fuels unit will be offline during the planned Hawaii refinery turnaround in late June, which is expected to last 30 to 45 days.
Second quarter throughput expectations: Hawaii throughput is expected to be between 77,000 and 81,000 barrels per day, Washington between 40,000 and 42,000 barrels per day, Wyoming between 14,000 and 16,000 barrels per day, and Montana between 45,000 and 49,000 barrels per day. This results in a system-wide midpoint throughput of 182,000 barrels per day.
Second quarter financial outlook: The April consolidated refining index averaged $42 per barrel, an increase of $23 per barrel compared to the first quarter. Hawaii refining margins continue to reflect a tight refined product supply environment across the Pacific Basin. The financial impact of the upcoming Hawaii turnaround is expected to be limited in the second quarter, with most of the impact shifting into the third quarter.
Renewables segment outlook: Sales volumes and earnings contribution from renewables are expected to be modest in the second quarter as operations are optimized and inventory is built. A more meaningful ramp is anticipated in the back half of the year following the Hawaii refinery turnaround.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Shareholder Return Plan
Share Repurchase Program: On the capital allocation front, we repurchased $28 million during the quarter at an average price of $38 per share. Since the program's inception, we've repurchased over 14 million shares or just over 20% of shares outstanding at an average price of $25 per share.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Key Q&A
Q:Can you confirm if Par has the highest jet yield in the group, estimated at roughly 15%, and discuss dynamics in the jet market?
A:Will Monteleone confirmed that 15% is a reasonable estimate and discussed the attractive economic incentives to maximize jet yields due to spreads between jet and ULSD. He also mentioned challenges in the jet market due to crude distillation offline globally and the loss of Persian Gulf exports to Europe, leading to Asian and Indian refiners backfilling Europe's jet requirements.
Q:Will the Hawaii product lag headwind of $126 million in Q1 reverse in Q2, and will there be an additional benefit from the drop in Singapore gas oil prices?
A:Shawn Flores stated it is too early to estimate the price lag reversal, as it depends on Singapore prices in June relative to March. He suggested a partial reversal of the $125 million impact is likely, but emphasized waiting for June pricing to confirm.
Q:Why were Hawaii captures in Q1 in the low 90% compared to the target of over 105%, and how is it tracking for Q2?
A:Shawn Flores attributed the 10%-15% capture hit to two factors: West Coast pricing flipping to a discount to Singapore and the pricing premium of gas oil and jet over secondary products like naphtha and LPGs. He noted these dynamics have normalized heading into Q2, with West Coast pricing now at a premium to Singapore.
Q:Is the planned Hawaii turnaround still tracking for end of June start-up, and is there any flexibility in the planning?
A:Will Monteleone confirmed the turnaround is tracking for end of June with limited flexibility due to hydrocracker catalyst life and contractor scheduling. Richard Creamer added that ensuring product supply in Hawaii is a primary goal, influencing the timing.
Q:Why is throughput guidance for Hawaii in Q2 light, and how will landed crude cost dynamics trend post-turnaround?
A:Will Monteleone explained the light throughput guidance reflects the estimated start time of the turnaround and crude supply chain optimization. He stated it is too early to predict Q3 landed crude differentials but highlighted factors like backwardation and risk management framework as key considerations.
Q:Are Singapore cracks stabilizing after initial spikes during the conflict, and what is the outlook for relative cracks?
A:Will Monteleone noted that Singapore cracks have normalized due to freight normalization and arbitrage opportunities. He suggested relative cracks are now more aligned between regions but cautioned that major changes could disrupt this balance.
Q:Will the company monetize small refinery exemptions for 2025, and what is the status of 2024 exemptions?
A:Shawn Flores stated they have monetized less than half of the 2024 exemptions and prefer to wait for EPA clarity on 2025 exemptions before further monetizing.
Q:What is the company's approach to stock buybacks given current free cash flow and stock price?
A:Will Monteleone reiterated their opportunistic framework for share repurchases, driven by excess capital, forward outlook, and intrinsic value. He indicated they would be more aggressive with buybacks at deeper discounts to intrinsic value and moderate when discounts are less attractive.
Q:Review of Unclear Management Responses
A:Management avoided giving a direct answer to the question about the reversal of the Hawaii product lag headwind and the additional benefit from the drop in Singapore gas oil prices. Shawn Flores stated it was too early to estimate and emphasized waiting for June pricing, which lacked clarity and specificity.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Earnings Word Cloud
The most frequently occurring keywords in this quarter's earning call
Hawaii throughput
Wyoming Montana
Wyoming throughput
addition
barrel day
capability
capital allocation
condition
crack
day fuel
day production
facility
foundation
front
high
level
maintenance
market
outage
policy
price share
production barrel
rate
refiner
refining
specification
store
summer month
supply chain
system
team
throughput barrel
turnaround Washington
unit
PARR Transcript
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
Unknown5-6
The earnings call shows mixed signals: solid operational efficiency and strategic share repurchases are offset by challenges like lower EBITDA and unclear guidance on key issues such as Hawaii's product lag reversal. The Q&A highlights uncertainties, especially in pricing dynamics and throughput guidance, which tempers optimism. Despite strategic initiatives and shareholder value focus, the lack of clear guidance and current market dynamics suggest a neutral stock price movement over the next two weeks for this mid-cap company.
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Positive11-5
The earnings call highlights strong financial performance with record revenues and low production costs. The Q&A section addressed concerns about jet versus diesel dynamics, with expected improvements. The announcement of a joint venture with Mitsubishi and ENEOS Corporation is a positive catalyst. Despite management's vague responses on RIN liability, the company's strong liquidity and strategic focus on renewables and growth projects suggest a positive outlook. The market cap suggests moderate sensitivity, leading to a predicted stock price increase of 2% to 8%.
PARR Report
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does this earnings call transcript come from?
All transcripts are sourced directly from the official live webcast or the company’s official investor relations website. We use the exact words spoken during the call with no paraphrasing of the core discussion.
How soon is the transcript available after the earnings call ends?
Full verbatim transcripts are typically published within 4–12 hours after the call ends. Same-day availability is guaranteed for all S&P 500 and most mid-cap companies.
Is the transcript edited or altered in any way?
No material content is ever changed or summarized in the “Full Transcript” section. We only correct obvious spoken typos (e.g., “um”, “ah”, repeated 10 times”, or clear misspoken ticker symbols) and add speaker names/titles for readability. Every substantive sentence remains 100% as spoken.
Why do some answers appear as “Unclear” or “Inaudible”?
When audio quality is poor or multiple speakers talk over each other, we mark the section instead of guessing. This ensures complete accuracy rather than introducing potential errors.
Who creates the AI Summary and Key Q&A highlights shown above the transcript?
They are generated by a specialized financial-language model trained exclusively on 15+ years of earnings transcripts. The model extracts financial figures, guidance, and tone with 97%+ accuracy and is regularly validated against human analysts. The full raw transcript always remains available for verification.
