NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
Access earnings results, analyst expectations, report, slides, earnings call, and transcript.
Overview
The earnings call indicates positive developments, such as strategic alliances, EPC partnerships, and interest from major organizations like NASA. The focus on addressing supply chain challenges and expediting reactor deployment timelines further enhances the outlook. However, management's lack of specific timelines and commitment to accelerate projects slightly tempers the optimism. Overall, the market is likely to react positively to the strategic initiatives and partnerships, leading to a stock price increase in the coming weeks.
Key Financial Performance
Cash and Cash Equivalents $577.5 million, an approximate $374 million increase year-over-year, driven by net proceeds from the October 2025 private placement.
Loss from Operations $11.6 million, an approximate $8 million increase year-over-year, primarily due to increased operating expenses focused on advancing KRONOS MMR and other strategic growth opportunities.
Net Loss $6.5 million, up approximately $3 million year-over-year, attributed to increased operating expenses, partially offset by $5 million of interest income from a larger cash balance.
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities $4 million, an increase of approximately $1 million year-over-year, due to higher G&A and R&D expenses.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities $3.1 million, including payments for the Oak Brook, Illinois engineering facility.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Operating Highlights
KRONOS MMR Development: Advancing towards licensing and construction. Completed site characterization and drilling at the University of Illinois. Signed MOU with the University of Illinois Board of Trustees. Received $6.8 million in incentive awards from the State of Illinois.
Global Expansion: Acquired Global First Power, rebranded as True North Nuclear, to progress licensing in Canada. Signed MOU with DS Dansuk for deployment opportunities in South Korea and Asia.
Commercial Feasibility: Signed feasibility study agreement with BaRupOn to evaluate deployment of KRONOS MMR systems for up to 1 gigawatt of power for AI data centers.
Strategic Partnerships: Signed MOU with Ameresco to explore integration of EPC capabilities for KRONOS MMR deployments on federal and commercial sites. Collaboration with DS Dansuk to accelerate deployment in South Korea and Asia.
Customer Pipeline: Expanding pipeline of potential customers in data center, industrial, and military sectors. Exploring opportunities in remote communities, mining operations, and energy-intensive applications.
Vertical Integration: Progress in nuclear fuel supply chain through partnerships and acquisitions. LIS Technologies received a radioactive material license and plans to invest $1.38 billion in a commercial enrichment facility in Tennessee.
Financial Strength: Raised $400 million in private placement, increasing cash position to $577.5 million. Added to Morgan Stanley National Security Index.
Regulatory Licensing: Targeting submission of construction permit application to NRC for KRONOS MMR in the U.S. and Canada. Aiming for construction at the University of Illinois by mid-to-late 2027.
Global Nuclear Renaissance: Positioning KRONOS MMR as a solution for growing energy demands, particularly for AI data centers and off-grid applications. Focus on reliable, clean baseload energy aligned with national priorities.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Risk or Challenges
Regulatory Licensing Challenges: The company faces potential delays and uncertainties in obtaining regulatory licensing for its KRONOS MMR in both the U.S. and Canada. This includes the submission of a construction permit application to the NRC and navigating the Part 50 licensing pathway.
Supply Chain Constraints: There are ongoing discussions with supply chain partners for key components, including reactor pressure vessels, fuel enrichment, and graphite supply. Any disruptions or delays in securing these components could impact project timelines.
Fuel Availability Risks: The availability of TRISO fuel and other nuclear fuel components is a critical constraint for deploying advanced reactors at scale. The company is working on vertical integration to address this, but challenges remain.
Economic and Financial Risks: The company reported a Q1 loss from operations of $11.6 million, driven by increased operating expenses. While it has a strong cash position, continued losses could strain financial resources over time.
Strategic Execution Risks: The company is pursuing multiple strategic initiatives, including vertical integration and international partnerships. Missteps in execution or delays in these initiatives could hinder progress and impact long-term goals.
Market and Competitive Pressures: The company faces competitive pressures in the nuclear energy sector, particularly in scaling its KRONOS MMR technology and securing market share in regions like South Korea and the broader Asian market.
Technological and Deployment Risks: While the KRONOS MMR is based on proven technology, the integration of components into a compact modular platform poses risks. Delays or technical issues in deployment could affect timelines and costs.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Guidance & Outlook
KRONOS MMR Licensing and Construction: Nano Nuclear plans to submit a construction permit application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in the coming months, targeting initial construction at the University of Illinois in mid-to-late 2027. A full-scale prototype is expected to be operational around 2030. The company is also advancing licensing efforts in Canada.
Commercial Deployment and Partnerships: Nano Nuclear is pursuing commercial opportunities, including a feasibility study with BaRupOn for deploying up to 1 gigawatt of power for AI data centers. The company is also exploring partnerships with DS Dansuk in South Korea and Ameresco for deployment and localization of KRONOS MMR systems.
Market Trends and Demand: The company anticipates growing demand for reliable, off-grid, and baseload power solutions driven by AI data centers, industrial reshoring, and electrification trends. KRONOS MMR is positioned to address these needs with scalable, modular designs.
Vertical Integration and Fuel Supply Chain: Nano Nuclear is working on vertical integration across the nuclear fuel supply chain, including enrichment, conversion, and transportation. The company is collaborating with LIS Technologies to develop laser enrichment technology and exploring acquisitions to enhance capabilities.
Financial Position and Investments: The company raised $400 million in October 2025, strengthening its balance sheet to support development and commercialization efforts. Plans include investing in strategic partnerships and M&A to enhance vertical integration.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Shareholder Return Plan
The selected topic was not discussed during the call.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Key Q&A
Q:What are the milestones or catalysts to watch for in the strategic alliance with DS Dansuk over the next 12 to 18 months?
A:The plan with DS Dansuk involves creating a manufacturing facility in Korea to address power bottlenecks in their industry. Over the next year, there will be more engagement with DS Dansuk, advancing the MOU into critical planning stages, and potential news about factories for mass manufacturing reactors. Additional partnerships on graphite acquisitions, fuel supply, and government interactions in South Korea are expected. Contracts for power offtake agreements and PPA agreements will also be pursued.
Q:Should we expect an EPC partnership in the U.S. and North America?
A:Yes, EPC partnerships are important for coordinating local construction crews for reactor deployment. Partnerships with companies like Ameresco, Hatch, and Hyundai have been explored. The EPCM component will be significant for deploying reactors in the U.S. and South Korea.
Q:Will there be any news prior to submitting the construction permit application, and is it on track for the first half of the year?
A:The construction permit application is on track for the first half of the year. While no announcements are expected prior to submission, the submission itself will be announced as it is a significant milestone. The company aims to be the first in the U.S. to build a full-scale licensed microreactor system.
Q:What are the potential pathways to accelerate the 2030 timeline for the UIUC project?
A:Government pressure on the NRC to expedite timelines, such as reducing the licensing period to 12 months, could help. However, the company is conservatively sticking to the 2030 timeline due to the complexity of reactor assessments. Efforts to expedite construction and focus on mass manufacturing facilities are ongoing to ensure readiness for commercialization by 2030 or earlier.
Q:Why did the company announce the request for information (RFI) for the LOKI MMR reactor design, and what feedback has been received?
A:The LOKI reactor, originally designed for space power, has garnered interest from organizations like Blue Origin and NASA. The RFI aims to find partners in the space industry to advance the design. The company has received a large number of RFIs and completed a submission with one partner, exploring opportunities in both space and terrestrial applications.
Q:What are the longest lead times or most challenging parts of the supply chain for the reactor?
A:The longest lead times involve nuclear-grade graphite and fuel supply. There are only three nuclear-grade graphite producers globally, and bringing new production online could take over 10 years. Fuel supply challenges include enrichment capacity and TRISO fuel fabrication. The company is engaging with suppliers and considering co-building production lines to address these challenges.
Q:What is the company's strategy for addressing fuel supply challenges?
A:The company is investing heavily in fuel supply, including partnerships with companies like Urenco for LEU fuel. They are also exploring acquisitions and strategic opportunities to secure uranium hexafluoride production. Announcements in this area are expected later this year.
Q:Does the University of Illinois retain a commercial stake in the reactor design?
A:No, the University of Illinois will own and operate the first-of-a-kind reactor system but will not have a commercial stake in the design. The commercial venture will be exclusively owned by Nano.
Q:What is the distinction between the reactor and balance of plant in the licensing process?
A:The NRC primarily focuses on the reactor and safety systems. Most of the balance of plant, such as turbines and heat exchangers, falls outside NRC oversight and can be built to standard engineering specifications. Once the reactor is licensed, subsequent deployments will require minimal regulatory engagement, provided standards are met.
Q:Can AI and digital twins impact the licensing process?
A:AI and digital twins could significantly reduce errors and streamline the licensing process by identifying what needs to be qualified and ensuring compliance with standards. This could lower costs and expedite reactor deployment by minimizing human error and improving efficiency.
Q:Review of Unclear Management Responses
A:Management avoided providing specific timelines for the construction of factories for mass manufacturing reactors and the exact timing of partnerships or government interactions in South Korea. Additionally, while they discussed potential pathways to expedite the 2030 timeline for the UIUC project, they did not commit to any accelerated timeline, citing the complexity of the licensing process.
You have reached the limit. Sign up to access full content
Get started
Earnings Word Cloud
The most frequently occurring keywords in this quarter's earning call
BaRupOn deployment
EPC
MMR system
MOU DS
MOU Trustees
NRC month
South Korea
Tennessee
affiliate LIS
announcement
architecture
campus
chemical processing
collaboration DS
deployment KRONOS
design temperature
energy chemical
focus integration
gigawatt
information
interest KRONOS
interest partner
learning
licensing construction
localization manufacturing
maintenance
meter grid
partnership acquisition
platform
pressure
processing manufacturing
progress KRONOS
progress date
progress partnership
proposition KRONOS
region
safety profile
study
term economics
use
NNE Transcript
NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
Positive2-18
The earnings call indicates positive developments, such as strategic alliances, EPC partnerships, and interest from major organizations like NASA. The focus on addressing supply chain challenges and expediting reactor deployment timelines further enhances the outlook. However, management's lack of specific timelines and commitment to accelerate projects slightly tempers the optimism. Overall, the market is likely to react positively to the strategic initiatives and partnerships, leading to a stock price increase in the coming weeks.
NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Unknown12-18
The earnings call summary shows mixed signals: strong financial metrics with increased cash position and strategic plans, but also significant losses and increased expenses. The Q&A reveals optimism about regulatory processes and strategic partnerships, but lacks detailed financial guidance. The lack of specific LCOE figures and incomplete details on uranium conversion raise uncertainties. Overall, the positive strategic outlook is balanced by financial concerns, leading to a neutral sentiment.
NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Unknown8-17
The earnings call reveals a significant increase in operational losses and net losses, driven by rising expenses. Despite a cash increase from a private placement, the financial health is concerning with higher cash burn expected. The Q&A session highlights uncertainties in licensing, commercialization, and supply chain strategies, with management providing unclear responses. These factors, combined with a lack of strong positive catalysts, suggest a negative sentiment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does this earnings call transcript come from?
All transcripts are sourced directly from the official live webcast or the company’s official investor relations website. We use the exact words spoken during the call with no paraphrasing of the core discussion.
How soon is the transcript available after the earnings call ends?
Full verbatim transcripts are typically published within 4–12 hours after the call ends. Same-day availability is guaranteed for all S&P 500 and most mid-cap companies.
Is the transcript edited or altered in any way?
No material content is ever changed or summarized in the “Full Transcript” section. We only correct obvious spoken typos (e.g., “um”, “ah”, repeated 10 times”, or clear misspoken ticker symbols) and add speaker names/titles for readability. Every substantive sentence remains 100% as spoken.
Why do some answers appear as “Unclear” or “Inaudible”?
When audio quality is poor or multiple speakers talk over each other, we mark the section instead of guessing. This ensures complete accuracy rather than introducing potential errors.
Who creates the AI Summary and Key Q&A highlights shown above the transcript?
They are generated by a specialized financial-language model trained exclusively on 15+ years of earnings transcripts. The model extracts financial figures, guidance, and tone with 97%+ accuracy and is regularly validated against human analysts. The full raw transcript always remains available for verification.
