Vital Farms Short Interest Rises to 37.1%
Welcome to this week's installment of "The Short Interest Report" - The Fly's weekly recap of short interest trends among some of the most widely followed high-short-float stocks. Using the data from our partner, which utilizes the latest information from stock lenders to estimate short interest changes for thousands of publicly traded companies, this report will screen for some of biggest changes in short interest as a percentage of free float and days-to-cover ratios while also considering the short interest data on some of the more volatile and heavier-traded names of the week. Based on the availability of data from Ortex, the report tracks the trading period that covers prior Friday through Thursday of this week, excluding holidays. As a basis of comparison for stocks discussed below, the S&P 500 index was up 1.4%, the Nasdaq Composite was up 1.9%, the Russell 2000 index was up 0.9%, the Russell 2000 Growth ETFwas up 1.1% and the Russell 2000 Value ETFwas up 0.6% in the five-day trading session range through May 1.SHORT INTEREST GAINERSOrtex-reported short interest on Vital Farmshad troughed just above 20% in the last week of March as the stock price finally found a floor after six months of heavy selling. Bears are re-emerging however, rebuilding their positions into strength after a bid in the stock price this week. In a five-day period covered, short interest as a percentage of free float rose over 5 percentage points to 37.1%, while days to cover on the name was up from 5.0 to 5.5. Shares gained about 7% in the period and added another 4% with Friday's rally, though the stock remains down 55% year-to-date.Ortex-reported short interest on Under Armourcollapsed from multi-year high of 35% in mid-January to as low as 21% entering the final week of March, remaining near that trough through the final week of April. This week, however, bearish positioning is on the rise while the stock price consolidates its April gains. In the 5-day period covered, short interest as a percentage of free float rose from 21.6% to 24.4%, and while the stock was down 1.4%, Under Armour shares have now bounced 16% from April 2 lows. The company reports its Q4 results on May 12.Ortex-reported short interest on BRC Grouptroughed below 19% last week, the lowest level in two and a half years, before a spike in the stock price after better-than-expected Q4 results on Wednesday spurred an increase in bearish activity. Short interest as a percentage of free float jumped from 19.2% to 22.6% while days-to-cover rose from 5.8 to 6.9. Shares of BRC Group were up about 12% in the five-day period covered through Thursday and gained another 4.5% on Friday, with the year-to-date tally on the stock now at 92%.SHORT INTEREST DECLINERSAs previewed last week, following a build-up in bearish positioning in Avis Budgetin conjunction with the extreme run-up in the stock price since the last week of March, the unwind in bullishness has also produced significant profit-taking among bears. Pentwater Capital, which held an outsized position in the name, disclosed that it has sold 4.3M shares in a Form 4 filing on Tuesday, crystallizing the sharp selloff seen in the stock price this week. In the five-day period covered, Ortex-reported short interest on the stock also fell sharply, going from 92.7% to 64.8%, with days-to-cover on the name also down a significant margin from 4.2 to 2.3. Shares of Avis Budget were off by about 21% in the period through Thursday but remain higher by 45% year-to-date.Ortex reported short interest in Shift4 Paymentshad tracked in a sideways range of 33%-38% since the first week of March, though with the stock price seemingly halting its 8-month long decline, bears are also reducing their exposure. This week short interest as a percentage of free float declined from 36.4% to 31.4% - the lowest level since the second week of February. Days to Cover and Shift4 also slipped from 7.2 to 6.3 even as trading volume on the name has diminished. The stock was still down 4.3% in the five-day period covered through Thursday but rallied 2% on Friday and has now bounced about 14% from its April 9th lows. The company is set to report its Q1 results on May 7.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Analyst Views on VITL
About VITL
About the author

- Class Action Reminder: The Schall Law Firm reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Vital Farms for violations of securities laws, concerning securities purchases between May 8, 2025, and February 26, 2026, with a deadline to contact the firm by May 26, 2026.
- False Statements Allegation: The complaint alleges that Vital Farms made false and misleading statements regarding the risks associated with its new ERP system, claiming they were merely hypothetical, which misled investors and resulted in financial losses when the truth emerged.
- Earnings Miss: As a consequence of the ERP delays, Vital Farms failed to meet consensus earnings per share expectations, highlighting significant failures in the company's disclosure practices that could undermine investor confidence.
- Legal Consultation Opportunity: The Schall Law Firm offers free legal consultations and encourages affected investors to join the lawsuit for potential recovery, demonstrating the firm's commitment to protecting shareholder rights.
- Class Action Notice: Rosen Law Firm reminds investors who purchased Vital Farms securities between May 8, 2025, and February 26, 2026, that they must apply to be lead plaintiff by May 26, 2026, to represent other investors in the class action lawsuit.
- Potential Compensation Opportunity: Investors participating in the class action may be entitled to compensation without any upfront fees, highlighting that Vital Farms failed to adequately disclose risks associated with the rollout of its new enterprise resource planning system, resulting in investor losses.
- Lawsuit Background: The lawsuit alleges that throughout the class period, Vital Farms made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose the true impact of delays in implementing the new system, causing the company to miss its full-year 2025 earnings guidance and earnings per share consensus.
- Law Firm's Advantage: Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, demonstrating its extensive experience and success in this field, prompting investors to carefully select qualified legal counsel.
- Class Action Notice: Rosen Law Firm reminds investors who purchased Vital Farms securities between May 8, 2025, and February 26, 2026, that they must apply to be lead plaintiff by May 26, 2026, to participate in the class action and potentially receive compensation.
- Lawsuit Background: The lawsuit alleges that Vital Farms downplayed the risks associated with delays in the rollout of its new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, which resulted in missing its full-year 2025 earnings guidance and consensus EPS, causing investor losses.
- Law Firm Credentials: Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services in 2017, demonstrating its expertise and success in this field.
- Investor Selection Advice: Investors are advised to carefully select law firms with proven success in leadership roles, avoiding those that merely act as intermediaries, to ensure effective legal representation and support in the class action.
- Class Action Initiated: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. has filed a class action lawsuit against Vital Farms in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, representing investors who purchased securities between May 8, 2025, and February 26, 2026, highlighting significant investor concerns regarding the company's financial transparency.
- False Statement Allegations: The complaint alleges that Vital Farms intentionally downplayed the risks associated with delays in its new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, leading to investor losses when the company failed to meet consensus earnings per share, reflecting serious deficiencies in corporate governance and information disclosure.
- Investor Losses: Due to the ERP delays, Vital Farms missed market earnings expectations, resulting in significant losses for investors when the truth emerged, underscoring the company's shortcomings in crisis management and risk control.
- Legal Consultation Opportunity: Investors have until May 26, 2026, to apply to be lead plaintiffs in the lawsuit, with Bragar Eagel & Squire offering free consultations to assist affected investors in asserting their legal rights.
- Class Action Notice: Rosen Law Firm reminds investors who purchased Vital Farms securities between May 8, 2025, and February 26, 2026, that they must apply to be lead plaintiff by May 26, 2026, to represent other investors in the class action lawsuit.
- Potential Compensation Opportunity: Investors participating in the class action may receive compensation without any out-of-pocket costs through a contingency fee arrangement, significantly reducing their financial risk.
- Lawsuit Background: The lawsuit alleges that Vital Farms failed to disclose the risks associated with delays in rolling out its new enterprise resource planning system, which led to the company missing its 2025 earnings guidance, resulting in investor losses.
- Law Firm's Strength: Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, demonstrating its expertise and successful track record in this field.
- Class Action Reminder: The Schall Law Firm alerts investors that Vital Farms is facing a class action lawsuit for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, concerning securities purchased between May 8, 2025, and February 26, 2026, with a deadline for investor contact set for May 26, 2026.
- False Statement Allegations: The complaint alleges that Vital Farms made false and misleading statements, claiming that the risks associated with its new ERP system were merely hypothetical, yet downplayed the actual delays when they occurred, resulting in the company missing consensus earnings per share expectations.
- Investor Losses: As the market became aware of the truth regarding Vital Farms, investors suffered damages, indicating that the company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period, which adversely affected investor decision-making.
- Legal Consultation Opportunity: The Schall Law Firm offers free consultations and encourages affected shareholders to reach out to discuss their rights, highlighting the firm's specialization in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation aimed at helping investors recover losses.











