AGNC Reports Q1 Comprehensive Loss of $0.18 per Share
Written by Emily J. Thompson, Senior Investment Analyst
Updated: Apr 20 2026
0mins
Should l Buy AGNC?
Reports Q1 comprehensive loss per share (18c). Reports tangible net book value per common share of $8.38 as of March 31, down (50c) per common share, or -5.6%, from $8.88 per common share as of December 31, 2025. "Agency MBS performance in Q1 was driven by two divergent macroeconomic themes," said CEO Peter Federico. "...The increase in volatility and negative shift in investor sentiment caused Agency MBS spreads to benchmark rates to widen, and, as a result, AGNC's economic return on tangible common equity in Q1 was negative 1.6%. Despite the quarter-over-quarter spread widening, Agency MBS generated a positive excess return to both US Treasuries and investment grade corporate bonds in Q1, again demonstrating the diversification benefit of this high credit quality, fixed income asset class. We continue to believe that many of the factors we cited at the beginning of the year remain positive catalysts for Agency MBS performance...As a result, our longer-term outlook for Agency MBS remains constructive, despite near-term challenges associated with heightened geopolitical and macroeconomic risks." "AGNC's negative 1.6% economic return on tangible common equity in Q1 was comprised of 36c of dividends per common share and a 50c decrease in tangible net book value per common share," said CFO Bernice Bell. "AGNC's net spread and dollar roll income per common share was 42c for the first quarter, an increase of 7c per common share from the prior quarter that was driven by a 25 basis point increase in our net interest spread...Finally, AGNC concluded the first quarter with tangible 'at risk' leverage of 7.4x and a significant liquidity position of $7.0B of unencumbered cash and Agency MBS, which constituted 60% of our tangible equity at quarter end."
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Stop guessing "Should I Buy AGNC?" and start using high-conviction signals backed by rigorous historical data.
Sign up today to access powerful investing tools and make smarter, data-driven decisions.
Analyst Views on AGNC
Wall Street analysts forecast AGNC stock price to rise
10 Analyst Rating
4 Buy
6 Hold
0 Sell
Moderate Buy
Current: 10.720
Low
10.00
Averages
11.71
High
13.00
Current: 10.720
Low
10.00
Averages
11.71
High
13.00
About AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp. is an investor in Agency residential mortgage-backed securities (Agency MBS), which benefit from a guarantee against credit losses by Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), or Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae). The Company's business is a source of private capital for the United States residential housing market. The Company invests on a leveraged basis, financing its Agency MBS assets primarily through repurchase agreements, and utilizes dynamic risk management strategies intended to protect the value of its portfolio from interest rate and other market risks. The Company may also invest in Agency multifamily MBS that are similarly guaranteed by a United States Government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) and in other assets related to the housing, mortgage or real estate markets that are not guaranteed by a GSE or United States Government agency.
About the author
Emily J. Thompson
Emily J. Thompson, a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) with 12 years in investment research, graduated with honors from the Wharton School. Specializing in industrial and technology stocks, she provides in-depth analysis for Intellectia’s earnings and market brief reports.
Comparing Dividends: AGNC vs Ares Capital
- AGNC Performance: Since its IPO, AGNC Investment's total return has closely tracked the S&P 500, but its 13% yield is accompanied by significant volatility, with dividends declining for over a decade, leading to reduced income and capital for dividend-dependent investors.
- Ares Capital's Growth Potential: As a business development company, Ares Capital focuses on lending to small businesses, and while its 10% yield is variable, it has shown recovery after cuts, with a business model that supports investment in growth-oriented companies, offering better long-term income potential.
- Risk and Return Trade-off: Neither AGNC nor Ares Capital is suitable for risk-averse investors; however, Ares Capital may provide a better option for income-seeking investors due to its growth bias, despite a slightly lower yield compared to AGNC.
- Investor Strategy Recommendation: AGNC may suit total return investors, while Ares Capital is more appealing for those seeking consistent income, especially given its more stable performance in dividends and stock price over time.
See More
AGNC vs Ares Capital: Dividend Yield Comparison
- Yield Analysis: AGNC Investment offers a high dividend yield of 13%, but its highly volatile dividends have declined over the past decade, posing risks of reduced income and capital for dividend-dependent investors.
- Business Model Comparison: Ares Capital, a business development company, provides a 10% yield and focuses on lending to small businesses; while its dividends also fluctuate, its growth-oriented model is more suitable for income-seeking investors.
- Investor Suitability: AGNC is more appropriate for total return investors, whereas Ares Capital may be a better choice for dividend lovers, as its dividends and stock price have shown more stability over time despite a lower yield.
- Market Performance: Since its IPO, AGNC's total return has closely tracked the S&P 500 index, indicating a relatively strong performance as a REIT, but may not meet the expectations of dividend-focused investors looking for consistent income.
See More
Comparing Dividends: AGNC vs. Ares Capital
- AGNC Performance: Since its IPO, AGNC Investment's total return has closely tracked the S&P 500 index, but its attractive 13% yield has been accompanied by a declining dividend over the past decade, posing risks for income-focused investors who may see reduced income and capital.
- Ares Capital's Growth Potential: As a business development company, Ares Capital focuses on lending to small businesses, and while its 10% yield is lower, its growth-oriented business model allows dividends to recover after economic downturns, indicating stronger long-term investment value.
- Risk vs. Reward: Both AGNC and Ares Capital are unsuitable for risk-averse investors; however, Ares Capital offers better income growth potential due to its focus on small business investments, making it more appealing for those seeking stable income.
- Investment Recommendation: Before investing in AGNC Investment Corp., investors should note that it did not make the Motley Fool Stock Advisor's list of the top 10 stocks, suggesting that its future returns may not match those of other potential high-growth stocks.
See More
Comparing Dividends: AGNC vs Realty Income
- Dividend Yield Comparison: AGNC Investment offers a high dividend yield of 13.4%, yet its stock price and dividends have been declining for years, potentially leading to capital erosion for dividend-dependent investors and impacting long-term returns.
- REIT Characteristics: AGNC Investment focuses on managing a portfolio of mortgage securities, and while its total return is similar to the S&P 500 index, most income-focused investors are unlikely to reinvest dividends, resulting in diminished actual returns.
- Stability of Realty Income: Realty Income provides a 5.2% dividend yield and has increased its dividends for 31 consecutive years; although the growth rate is modest, it slightly exceeds inflation, making it suitable for investors relying on dividends for daily expenses.
- Investment Strategy Alignment: While AGNC Investment may seem attractive based solely on dividend yield, a deeper analysis reveals that AGNC is better suited for investors seeking total returns, whereas Realty Income is more appropriate for those needing stable cash flow from dividends.
See More
Comparison of AGNC and Realty Income Yields
- Yield Comparison: AGNC Investment boasts a dividend yield of 13.4%, more than double Realty Income's 5.2%, yet a high yield does not necessarily equate to a superior investment choice, highlighting the need for deeper analysis.
- Investment Strategy Differences: AGNC is tailored for investors seeking total returns, while Realty Income is better suited for those relying on dividends for living expenses, with the latter's dividends having increased annually for 31 years, slightly outpacing inflation.
- Market Performance Analysis: Although AGNC's total return has been comparable to the S&P 500 index, the declining trend in both dividends and stock price poses risks for income-focused investors, potentially leading to reduced capital and income.
- Investment Risk Assessment: Realty Income's investment-grade rating and conservative operational history position it as a low-risk dividend stock; despite its lower yield, its stability and long-term growth potential make it an ideal choice for most dividend investors.
See More
Federal Reserve Holds Rates Steady, Banks Show Tepid Response
- Rate Policy Stability: The Federal Reserve decided to keep the federal funds rate in the 3.5% to 3.75% range during its April 29 meeting, with inflation rising due to higher energy costs, and the market does not expect rate cuts this year, resulting in limited impact on bank stocks.
- Tepid Bank Stock Response: Following the Fed's decision, shares of JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America saw slight increases but subsequently dropped, with both down 3% to 4% by May 5, reflecting market concerns over economic outlook.
- Loan Activity and Rates: While higher rates typically benefit banks by allowing them to charge more for loans, they may also suppress loan activity; however, both JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America reported strong loan activity in Q1, achieving higher net interest income despite lower rates compared to last year.
- Active M&A Environment: The first quarter experienced a surge in mergers and acquisitions due to lower interest rates, and while the Fed's decision to maintain rates is unlikely to hinder this activity, both JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, as top investment banks, benefited from this trend.
See More
Comparing Dividends: AGNC vs Ares Capital
- AGNC Performance: Since its IPO, AGNC Investment's total return has closely tracked the S&P 500, but its 13% yield is accompanied by significant volatility, with dividends declining for over a decade, leading to reduced income and capital for dividend-dependent investors.
- Ares Capital's Growth Potential: As a business development company, Ares Capital focuses on lending to small businesses, and while its 10% yield is variable, it has shown recovery after cuts, with a business model that supports investment in growth-oriented companies, offering better long-term income potential.
- Risk and Return Trade-off: Neither AGNC nor Ares Capital is suitable for risk-averse investors; however, Ares Capital may provide a better option for income-seeking investors due to its growth bias, despite a slightly lower yield compared to AGNC.
- Investor Strategy Recommendation: AGNC may suit total return investors, while Ares Capital is more appealing for those seeking consistent income, especially given its more stable performance in dividends and stock price over time.
See More
AGNC vs Ares Capital: Dividend Yield Comparison
- Yield Analysis: AGNC Investment offers a high dividend yield of 13%, but its highly volatile dividends have declined over the past decade, posing risks of reduced income and capital for dividend-dependent investors.
- Business Model Comparison: Ares Capital, a business development company, provides a 10% yield and focuses on lending to small businesses; while its dividends also fluctuate, its growth-oriented model is more suitable for income-seeking investors.
- Investor Suitability: AGNC is more appropriate for total return investors, whereas Ares Capital may be a better choice for dividend lovers, as its dividends and stock price have shown more stability over time despite a lower yield.
- Market Performance: Since its IPO, AGNC's total return has closely tracked the S&P 500 index, indicating a relatively strong performance as a REIT, but may not meet the expectations of dividend-focused investors looking for consistent income.
See More
Comparing Dividends: AGNC vs. Ares Capital
- AGNC Performance: Since its IPO, AGNC Investment's total return has closely tracked the S&P 500 index, but its attractive 13% yield has been accompanied by a declining dividend over the past decade, posing risks for income-focused investors who may see reduced income and capital.
- Ares Capital's Growth Potential: As a business development company, Ares Capital focuses on lending to small businesses, and while its 10% yield is lower, its growth-oriented business model allows dividends to recover after economic downturns, indicating stronger long-term investment value.
- Risk vs. Reward: Both AGNC and Ares Capital are unsuitable for risk-averse investors; however, Ares Capital offers better income growth potential due to its focus on small business investments, making it more appealing for those seeking stable income.
- Investment Recommendation: Before investing in AGNC Investment Corp., investors should note that it did not make the Motley Fool Stock Advisor's list of the top 10 stocks, suggesting that its future returns may not match those of other potential high-growth stocks.
See More
Comparing Dividends: AGNC vs Realty Income
- Dividend Yield Comparison: AGNC Investment offers a high dividend yield of 13.4%, yet its stock price and dividends have been declining for years, potentially leading to capital erosion for dividend-dependent investors and impacting long-term returns.
- REIT Characteristics: AGNC Investment focuses on managing a portfolio of mortgage securities, and while its total return is similar to the S&P 500 index, most income-focused investors are unlikely to reinvest dividends, resulting in diminished actual returns.
- Stability of Realty Income: Realty Income provides a 5.2% dividend yield and has increased its dividends for 31 consecutive years; although the growth rate is modest, it slightly exceeds inflation, making it suitable for investors relying on dividends for daily expenses.
- Investment Strategy Alignment: While AGNC Investment may seem attractive based solely on dividend yield, a deeper analysis reveals that AGNC is better suited for investors seeking total returns, whereas Realty Income is more appropriate for those needing stable cash flow from dividends.
See More
Comparison of AGNC and Realty Income Yields
- Yield Comparison: AGNC Investment boasts a dividend yield of 13.4%, more than double Realty Income's 5.2%, yet a high yield does not necessarily equate to a superior investment choice, highlighting the need for deeper analysis.
- Investment Strategy Differences: AGNC is tailored for investors seeking total returns, while Realty Income is better suited for those relying on dividends for living expenses, with the latter's dividends having increased annually for 31 years, slightly outpacing inflation.
- Market Performance Analysis: Although AGNC's total return has been comparable to the S&P 500 index, the declining trend in both dividends and stock price poses risks for income-focused investors, potentially leading to reduced capital and income.
- Investment Risk Assessment: Realty Income's investment-grade rating and conservative operational history position it as a low-risk dividend stock; despite its lower yield, its stability and long-term growth potential make it an ideal choice for most dividend investors.
See More
Federal Reserve Holds Rates Steady, Banks Show Tepid Response
- Rate Policy Stability: The Federal Reserve decided to keep the federal funds rate in the 3.5% to 3.75% range during its April 29 meeting, with inflation rising due to higher energy costs, and the market does not expect rate cuts this year, resulting in limited impact on bank stocks.
- Tepid Bank Stock Response: Following the Fed's decision, shares of JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America saw slight increases but subsequently dropped, with both down 3% to 4% by May 5, reflecting market concerns over economic outlook.
- Loan Activity and Rates: While higher rates typically benefit banks by allowing them to charge more for loans, they may also suppress loan activity; however, both JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America reported strong loan activity in Q1, achieving higher net interest income despite lower rates compared to last year.
- Active M&A Environment: The first quarter experienced a surge in mergers and acquisitions due to lower interest rates, and while the Fed's decision to maintain rates is unlikely to hinder this activity, both JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, as top investment banks, benefited from this trend.
See More
