Vital Farms Short Interest Rises to 40.6%
Welcome to this week's installment of "The Short Interest Report" - The Fly's weekly recap of short interest trends among some of the most widely followed high-short-float stocks. Using the data from our partner, which utilizes the latest information from stock lenders to estimate short interest changes for thousands of publicly traded companies, this report will screen for some of biggest changes in short interest as a percentage of free float and days-to-cover ratios while also considering the short interest data on some of the more volatile and heavier-traded names of the week. Based on the availability of data from Ortex, the report tracks the trading period that covers prior Friday through Thursday of this week, excluding holidays. As a basis of comparison for stocks discussed below, the S&P 500 index was up 1.8%, the Nasdaq Composite was up 3.7%, the Russell 2000 index was up 1.4%, the Russell 2000 Growth ETFwas up 1.9% and the Russell 2000 Value ETFwas up 1.1% in the five-day trading session range through May 7.SHORT INTEREST GAINERSOrtex-reported short interest on Vital Farmscontinued its steep ascent this week, rising another three percentage points to 40.6% - the highest level on record. Days-to-cover on the name slipped from 5.5 to 4.9 as trading volumes soared to their highest levels of the year after the company reported Q1 results on Thursday. As discussed last week, the resurgence in bearishness since the final week of March coincided with the stock settling into a trading range, though the severe post-earnings decline rewarded shortsellers as shares fell over 20% in a single session. The 5-day period tally through Thursday saw the stock fall 30%, and year-to-date, Vital Farms is now down 70%.Ortex-reported short interest on Kura Sushitroughed at about 27% early last week just as shares slipped to their lowest level of the year. Bears have increased exposure, however, with the stock price settling into a sideways trading range. Short interest as a percentage of free float rose from 27.2% to 30.3% this week while days-to-cover is nudged higher from 6.3 to 6.6. The company is about a month out from reporting its Q2 results in early April, along with the departure of its CFO, which prompted an 18% decline in the stock price, even though the Street bumped up their price targets on the name. In the five-day period covered through Thursday of this week, shares of Kura Sushi were up 2.2%, and year-to-date the stock is up about 8%.Ortex-reported short interest on Fluence Energyhas nudged higher from 25.4% to 26.9% and days-to-cover on the name was unchanged at 4.9. The six-week-long uptrend in bearish positioning will surely be tested in the coming sessions however as the stock is soaring after better-than-expected results out Wednesday evening and positive research notes from sell-side analysts – Roth Capital pointed to Fluence Energy's "significant commercial momentum" in upgrading the stock to a Buy while Goldman Sachs cited the company's data center opportunity in bumping up its price target and retaining its Buy rating. In the five-day period covered, the stock is up 56%, with another 28% gain coming on Friday.SHORT INTEREST DECLINERSShares of Newegg Commercehit 2026 lows with a 16% decline in the five-day period covered through Thursday and another 12% selloff on Friday, having now retreated by about 45% from early-April highs in just a three-week span, and short-sellers are seemingly booking profits. In the five-day period covered through Thursday, short interest as a percentage of free float on the online PC hardware and electronics retailer fell from 51.0% all the way down to about 25% - the lowest level since December – according to Ortex data. Days-to-cover on Newegg nudged higher meanwhile, rising from 4.2 to 4.3.Ortex-reported short interest on Concentrixhad reached multi-month highs near 30% entering the final week of April, though bearish positioning has now receded for the second consecutive week, slipping from 26.3% to 20.3% in a 5-day period covered through Thursday. Days-to-cover on the name also slid from 7.0 to 6.3, further skewed by elevated trading volume - the second highest session of the year - seen last Friday. The stock was down sharply after the company reported a Q1 earnings miss in late March and then saw its lowest levels of the year in late April before finding its footing this week - shares were up 7% this week, though year-to-date the stock remains down 39%, with another 5% loss on Friday tracking broader weakness in IT services.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Analyst Views on VITL
About VITL
About the author

- Class Action Reminder: The Schall Law Firm reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Vital Farms for violations of securities laws, concerning securities purchases between May 8, 2025, and February 26, 2026, with a deadline to contact the firm by May 26, 2026.
- False Statements Allegation: The complaint alleges that Vital Farms made false and misleading statements regarding the risks associated with its new ERP system, claiming they were merely hypothetical, which misled investors and resulted in financial losses when the truth emerged.
- Earnings Miss: As a consequence of the ERP delays, Vital Farms failed to meet consensus earnings per share expectations, highlighting significant failures in the company's disclosure practices that could undermine investor confidence.
- Legal Consultation Opportunity: The Schall Law Firm offers free legal consultations and encourages affected investors to join the lawsuit for potential recovery, demonstrating the firm's commitment to protecting shareholder rights.
- Class Action Notice: Rosen Law Firm reminds investors who purchased Vital Farms securities between May 8, 2025, and February 26, 2026, that they must apply to be lead plaintiff by May 26, 2026, to represent other investors in the class action lawsuit.
- Potential Compensation Opportunity: Investors participating in the class action may be entitled to compensation without any upfront fees, highlighting that Vital Farms failed to adequately disclose risks associated with the rollout of its new enterprise resource planning system, resulting in investor losses.
- Lawsuit Background: The lawsuit alleges that throughout the class period, Vital Farms made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose the true impact of delays in implementing the new system, causing the company to miss its full-year 2025 earnings guidance and earnings per share consensus.
- Law Firm's Advantage: Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, demonstrating its extensive experience and success in this field, prompting investors to carefully select qualified legal counsel.
- Class Action Notice: Rosen Law Firm reminds investors who purchased Vital Farms securities between May 8, 2025, and February 26, 2026, that they must apply to be lead plaintiff by May 26, 2026, to participate in the class action and potentially receive compensation.
- Lawsuit Background: The lawsuit alleges that Vital Farms downplayed the risks associated with delays in the rollout of its new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, which resulted in missing its full-year 2025 earnings guidance and consensus EPS, causing investor losses.
- Law Firm Credentials: Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services in 2017, demonstrating its expertise and success in this field.
- Investor Selection Advice: Investors are advised to carefully select law firms with proven success in leadership roles, avoiding those that merely act as intermediaries, to ensure effective legal representation and support in the class action.
- Class Action Initiated: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. has filed a class action lawsuit against Vital Farms in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, representing investors who purchased securities between May 8, 2025, and February 26, 2026, highlighting significant investor concerns regarding the company's financial transparency.
- False Statement Allegations: The complaint alleges that Vital Farms intentionally downplayed the risks associated with delays in its new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, leading to investor losses when the company failed to meet consensus earnings per share, reflecting serious deficiencies in corporate governance and information disclosure.
- Investor Losses: Due to the ERP delays, Vital Farms missed market earnings expectations, resulting in significant losses for investors when the truth emerged, underscoring the company's shortcomings in crisis management and risk control.
- Legal Consultation Opportunity: Investors have until May 26, 2026, to apply to be lead plaintiffs in the lawsuit, with Bragar Eagel & Squire offering free consultations to assist affected investors in asserting their legal rights.
- Class Action Notice: Rosen Law Firm reminds investors who purchased Vital Farms securities between May 8, 2025, and February 26, 2026, that they must apply to be lead plaintiff by May 26, 2026, to represent other investors in the class action lawsuit.
- Potential Compensation Opportunity: Investors participating in the class action may receive compensation without any out-of-pocket costs through a contingency fee arrangement, significantly reducing their financial risk.
- Lawsuit Background: The lawsuit alleges that Vital Farms failed to disclose the risks associated with delays in rolling out its new enterprise resource planning system, which led to the company missing its 2025 earnings guidance, resulting in investor losses.
- Law Firm's Strength: Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, demonstrating its expertise and successful track record in this field.
- Class Action Reminder: The Schall Law Firm alerts investors that Vital Farms is facing a class action lawsuit for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, concerning securities purchased between May 8, 2025, and February 26, 2026, with a deadline for investor contact set for May 26, 2026.
- False Statement Allegations: The complaint alleges that Vital Farms made false and misleading statements, claiming that the risks associated with its new ERP system were merely hypothetical, yet downplayed the actual delays when they occurred, resulting in the company missing consensus earnings per share expectations.
- Investor Losses: As the market became aware of the truth regarding Vital Farms, investors suffered damages, indicating that the company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period, which adversely affected investor decision-making.
- Legal Consultation Opportunity: The Schall Law Firm offers free consultations and encourages affected shareholders to reach out to discuss their rights, highlighting the firm's specialization in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation aimed at helping investors recover losses.











