Comparison of VanEck and iShares Single-Crypto ETFs
- Cost Comparison: VanEck's HODL ETF has an expense ratio of 0.20%, making it slightly more cost-effective than iShares' ETHA ETF at 0.25%, which can enhance returns for long-term holders by reducing costs.
- Performance Discrepancy: As of April 24, 2026, HODL reported a one-year return of -18.6%, while ETHA achieved a positive return of 28.16%, highlighting significant performance differences that investors should carefully consider when making choices.
- Maximum Drawdown Analysis: HODL's maximum one-year drawdown stands at 49.25%, compared to ETHA's 64.02%, indicating that while ETHA offers higher returns, it also comes with significantly increased risk, necessitating careful risk assessment by investors.
- Assets Under Management: ETHA boasts $7.4 billion in assets under management, significantly larger than HODL's $1.3 billion, with this scale difference potentially impacting liquidity and market acceptance, factors that investors should weigh in their decision-making process.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Analyst Views on ETHA
No data
About the author
Comparison of VanEck and iShares Single-Crypto ETFs
- Cost Comparison: VanEck's HODL ETF has an expense ratio of 0.20%, making it slightly more cost-effective than iShares' ETHA ETF at 0.25%, which can enhance returns for long-term holders by reducing costs.
- Performance Discrepancy: As of April 24, 2026, HODL reported a one-year return of -18.6%, while ETHA achieved a positive return of 28.16%, highlighting significant performance differences that investors should carefully consider when making choices.
- Maximum Drawdown Analysis: HODL's maximum one-year drawdown stands at 49.25%, compared to ETHA's 64.02%, indicating that while ETHA offers higher returns, it also comes with significantly increased risk, necessitating careful risk assessment by investors.
- Assets Under Management: ETHA boasts $7.4 billion in assets under management, significantly larger than HODL's $1.3 billion, with this scale difference potentially impacting liquidity and market acceptance, factors that investors should weigh in their decision-making process.
Comparison of iShares Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs
- Cost and Size: Both iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) and Ethereum ETF (ETHA) charge a 0.25% expense ratio, with IBIT managing $63.7 billion in assets compared to ETHA's $7.6 billion, indicating IBIT's dominant market position.
- Performance Discrepancy: As of April 22, 2026, IBIT has a one-year return of -14.1%, while ETHA has surged by 40.7%, reflecting Ethereum's strong performance despite ETHA's maximum drawdown of -64.02%.
- Risk Assessment: IBIT's maximum drawdown stands at -49.36%, highlighting greater volatility in ETHA, which has a shorter history of just 1.8 years, necessitating careful consideration of risk tolerance when choosing between the two.
- Investment Convenience: Both ETFs can be traded within standard brokerage accounts, eliminating the need for crypto wallets and private key management, and they are eligible for tax-advantaged accounts, although investors incur a 0.25% annual fee.
BlackRock Moves 12,080 ETH and 113.342 BTC to Coinbase Prime
BlackRock's Recent Transfers: BlackRock transferred approximately 12,080 ETH to Coinbase Prime, valued at around $27.94 million, via its Ethereum ETF, ETHA.
Bitcoin Transfer Details: Additionally, BlackRock transferred 113.342 BTC to Coinbase Prime, valued at approximately $8.81 million, through its Bitcoin ETF, IBIT.
SBET Shares Decline Despite Positive Outlook as Crypto Market Declines – Analyst Highlights 'Distinct Advantage' Over BMNR and ETHM
Sharp Link Gaming's Financial Position: Sharp Link Gaming is highlighted as having no debt and a full balance sheet, positioning it uniquely in the Ethereum accumulation space, second only to Bitmine Immersion Technologies.
Market Performance: Despite a 'Buy' rating and a price target of $10, shares of Sharp Link Gaming dipped over 2% in pre-market trading, influenced by a broader sell-off in the cryptocurrency market.
Ethereum Holdings: Sharp Link Gaming holds approximately 868,699 ETH, making it a significant corporate holder of Ethereum, while Bitmine recently announced its largest weekly purchase of over 71,000 ETH.
Stock Sentiment: Retail sentiment around Sharp Link Gaming remains bullish, while the overall cryptocurrency market sentiment has been bearish, with significant declines in stock values for both SBET and BMNR year-to-date.
Nonprofit Organization Assists in Managing Ethereum, Achieving a Record $46 Million in ETH Stakes
Staking Initiative: The Ethereum Foundation has initiated a staking program aiming to allocate up to 70,000 ETH to enhance network security, with a current treasury holding of approximately 147,471 ETH valued at around $302 million.
Expected Returns: The foundation anticipates earning annual returns between 2.8% and 4%, which will be reinvested into research and development efforts.
Institutional Interest: There is a growing institutional interest in staking Ethereum, with companies like Bitmine Immersion Technologies also participating as part of their treasury strategy.
Market Sentiment: Ethereum's price has seen a rise of over 3% recently, with retail sentiment around the cryptocurrency fluctuating between bullish and neutral.
Comparison of Fidelity and iShares Cryptocurrency ETFs
- Fund Size Comparison: Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) manages $12.3 billion in assets, significantly larger than iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) at $6.7 billion, indicating FBTC's dominant position in attracting institutional investor interest.
- Return and Risk Analysis: FBTC posted a one-year return of -21.4%, while ETHA achieved a 2.18% return, despite ETHA's maximum drawdown of -61.66%, highlighting the higher volatility and potential risks associated with ether.
- Investment Structure Characteristics: FBTC allocates nearly all its assets to bitcoin, while ETHA holds 100% ether, lacking diversification, which results in highly correlated performance during market fluctuations, necessitating careful selection by investors.
- Market Influencing Factors: FBTC is significantly influenced by institutional liquidity and overall market sentiment, whereas ETHA relies more on the usage of the Ethereum network and ecosystem growth, prompting investors to choose a crypto asset investment strategy aligned with their goals.
Comparison of VanEck and iShares Single-Crypto ETFs
- Cost Comparison: VanEck's HODL ETF has an expense ratio of 0.20%, making it slightly more cost-effective than iShares' ETHA ETF at 0.25%, which can enhance returns for long-term holders by reducing costs.
- Performance Discrepancy: As of April 24, 2026, HODL reported a one-year return of -18.6%, while ETHA achieved a positive return of 28.16%, highlighting significant performance differences that investors should carefully consider when making choices.
- Maximum Drawdown Analysis: HODL's maximum one-year drawdown stands at 49.25%, compared to ETHA's 64.02%, indicating that while ETHA offers higher returns, it also comes with significantly increased risk, necessitating careful risk assessment by investors.
- Assets Under Management: ETHA boasts $7.4 billion in assets under management, significantly larger than HODL's $1.3 billion, with this scale difference potentially impacting liquidity and market acceptance, factors that investors should weigh in their decision-making process.
Comparison of iShares Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs
- Cost and Size: Both iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) and Ethereum ETF (ETHA) charge a 0.25% expense ratio, with IBIT managing $63.7 billion in assets compared to ETHA's $7.6 billion, indicating IBIT's dominant market position.
- Performance Discrepancy: As of April 22, 2026, IBIT has a one-year return of -14.1%, while ETHA has surged by 40.7%, reflecting Ethereum's strong performance despite ETHA's maximum drawdown of -64.02%.
- Risk Assessment: IBIT's maximum drawdown stands at -49.36%, highlighting greater volatility in ETHA, which has a shorter history of just 1.8 years, necessitating careful consideration of risk tolerance when choosing between the two.
- Investment Convenience: Both ETFs can be traded within standard brokerage accounts, eliminating the need for crypto wallets and private key management, and they are eligible for tax-advantaged accounts, although investors incur a 0.25% annual fee.
BlackRock Moves 12,080 ETH and 113.342 BTC to Coinbase Prime
BlackRock's Recent Transfers: BlackRock transferred approximately 12,080 ETH to Coinbase Prime, valued at around $27.94 million, via its Ethereum ETF, ETHA.
Bitcoin Transfer Details: Additionally, BlackRock transferred 113.342 BTC to Coinbase Prime, valued at approximately $8.81 million, through its Bitcoin ETF, IBIT.
SBET Shares Decline Despite Positive Outlook as Crypto Market Declines – Analyst Highlights 'Distinct Advantage' Over BMNR and ETHM
Sharp Link Gaming's Financial Position: Sharp Link Gaming is highlighted as having no debt and a full balance sheet, positioning it uniquely in the Ethereum accumulation space, second only to Bitmine Immersion Technologies.
Market Performance: Despite a 'Buy' rating and a price target of $10, shares of Sharp Link Gaming dipped over 2% in pre-market trading, influenced by a broader sell-off in the cryptocurrency market.
Ethereum Holdings: Sharp Link Gaming holds approximately 868,699 ETH, making it a significant corporate holder of Ethereum, while Bitmine recently announced its largest weekly purchase of over 71,000 ETH.
Stock Sentiment: Retail sentiment around Sharp Link Gaming remains bullish, while the overall cryptocurrency market sentiment has been bearish, with significant declines in stock values for both SBET and BMNR year-to-date.
Nonprofit Organization Assists in Managing Ethereum, Achieving a Record $46 Million in ETH Stakes
Staking Initiative: The Ethereum Foundation has initiated a staking program aiming to allocate up to 70,000 ETH to enhance network security, with a current treasury holding of approximately 147,471 ETH valued at around $302 million.
Expected Returns: The foundation anticipates earning annual returns between 2.8% and 4%, which will be reinvested into research and development efforts.
Institutional Interest: There is a growing institutional interest in staking Ethereum, with companies like Bitmine Immersion Technologies also participating as part of their treasury strategy.
Market Sentiment: Ethereum's price has seen a rise of over 3% recently, with retail sentiment around the cryptocurrency fluctuating between bullish and neutral.
Comparison of Fidelity and iShares Cryptocurrency ETFs
- Fund Size Comparison: Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) manages $12.3 billion in assets, significantly larger than iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) at $6.7 billion, indicating FBTC's dominant position in attracting institutional investor interest.
- Return and Risk Analysis: FBTC posted a one-year return of -21.4%, while ETHA achieved a 2.18% return, despite ETHA's maximum drawdown of -61.66%, highlighting the higher volatility and potential risks associated with ether.
- Investment Structure Characteristics: FBTC allocates nearly all its assets to bitcoin, while ETHA holds 100% ether, lacking diversification, which results in highly correlated performance during market fluctuations, necessitating careful selection by investors.
- Market Influencing Factors: FBTC is significantly influenced by institutional liquidity and overall market sentiment, whereas ETHA relies more on the usage of the Ethereum network and ecosystem growth, prompting investors to choose a crypto asset investment strategy aligned with their goals.
