Comparison of Leveraged ETFs: QLD vs SSO
Written by Emily J. Thompson, Senior Investment Analyst
Updated: 6h ago
0mins
Should l Buy NVDA?
Source: NASDAQ.COM
- Expense and Yield Comparison: QLD has a slightly higher expense ratio than SSO, making it less appealing for cost-conscious investors, even though QLD delivered a stronger one-year return, its significantly deeper five-year drawdown highlights its high-risk profile.
- Portfolio Composition Differences: QLD allocates 53% of its portfolio to technology stocks, with top holdings including Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, while SSO tracks the S&P 500 with 503 holdings and a 35% allocation to tech, resulting in notable differences in risk and earning potential.
- Leverage Effects and Risks: Both ETFs utilize daily 2x leverage; while QLD's tech-heavy focus may attract investors seeking high returns, its higher volatility makes it suitable for short-term investors, whereas SSO offers relatively stable returns for those seeking consistency.
- Market Performance and Investment Strategy: As QLD and SSO track the Nasdaq-100 and S&P 500 respectively, the latter's diversification leads to lower volatility, although both can experience significant intraday fluctuations, requiring investors to choose ETFs based on their risk tolerance.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Stop guessing "Should I Buy NVDA?" and start using high-conviction signals backed by rigorous historical data.
Sign up today to access powerful investing tools and make smarter, data-driven decisions.
Analyst Views on NVDA
Wall Street analysts forecast NVDA stock price to rise over the next 12 months. According to Wall Street analysts, the average 1-year price target for NVDA is 264.97 USD with a low forecast of 200.00 USD and a high forecast of 352.00 USD. However, analyst price targets are subjective and often lag stock prices, so investors should focus on the objective reasons behind analyst rating changes, which better reflect the company's fundamentals.
41 Analyst Rating
39 Buy
1 Hold
1 Sell
Strong Buy
Current: 171.880
Low
200.00
Averages
264.97
High
352.00
Current: 171.880
Low
200.00
Averages
264.97
High
352.00
About NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation is a full-stack computing infrastructure company. The Company is engaged in accelerated computing to help solve the challenging computational problems. The Company’s segments include Compute & Networking and Graphics. The Compute & Networking segment includes its Data Center accelerated computing platforms and artificial intelligence (AI) solutions and software; networking; automotive platforms and autonomous and electric vehicle solutions; Jetson for robotics and other embedded platforms, and DGX Cloud computing services. The Graphics segment includes GeForce GPUs for gaming and PCs, the GeForce NOW game streaming service and related infrastructure, and solutions for gaming platforms; Quadro/NVIDIA RTX GPUs for enterprise workstation graphics; virtual GPU software for cloud-based visual and virtual computing; automotive platforms for infotainment systems, and Omniverse Enterprise software for building and operating industrial AI and digital twin applications.
About the author
Emily J. Thompson
Emily J. Thompson, a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) with 12 years in investment research, graduated with honors from the Wharton School. Specializing in industrial and technology stocks, she provides in-depth analysis for Intellectia’s earnings and market brief reports.
Nvidia vs. Oracle: Compelling Investment Stories
- Nvidia's Market Performance: Nvidia's stock has surged over 700% in the past three years, pushing its market capitalization beyond $4 trillion, making it the largest company globally, which highlights its dominant position in high-performance AI applications and attracts significant investor interest.
- Oracle's Market Challenges: Oracle, with a market cap of $440 billion, has seen its stock drop over 52% since last September, primarily due to high spending on AI infrastructure and a debt exceeding $100 billion, raising concerns about its financial health among investors.
- Financial Performance Highlights: Oracle's recent Q2 FY2026 earnings report revealed a 14% year-over-year revenue increase to $16.05 billion, with net income soaring 95% to $6.13 billion, including a $2.7 billion pre-tax gain, showcasing its strong growth potential in the cloud computing sector.
- Future Growth Expectations: Despite facing debt pressures, Oracle's forward price-to-earnings ratio stands at just 19.8, indicating that its stock is at a two-year low, and analysts expect significant revenue growth in the future, potentially providing a good buying opportunity for investors.
See More
Nvidia Stock Valuation Low, Potential for Rebound
- Valuation Drop: Nvidia's stock currently trades at a forward P/E ratio of 25, slightly above last spring's lows, yet the market's strong growth expectations could yield substantial returns for investors.
- Market Recovery: Despite a pullback in tech stocks since October, Nvidia's price is poised for significant growth in the coming years, particularly as the AI computing market continues to expand.
- Rising Capital Expenditure: AI hyperscalers have announced record capital expenditure plans for 2026, with global data center spending projected to reach $3 trillion to $4 trillion annually, positioning Nvidia as a key beneficiary.
- Strong Revenue Outlook: Analysts forecast a 52% revenue increase for Nvidia in fiscal 2027, indicating robust performance in the AI sector and sustained market demand, despite a slight slowdown in growth rate.
See More
Comparative Analysis of Climate-Focused ETFs
- Cost and Return Comparison: NZAC has an expense ratio of 0.12% compared to IEFA's 0.07%, and while NZAC's one-year return stands at 15.11%, IEFA significantly outperforms with 28.70%, highlighting IEFA's advantages in cost efficiency and yield.
- Holdings Structure Differences: NZAC holds 729 stocks with 32% in technology, featuring major companies like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, whereas IEFA tracks 2,589 stocks primarily in financial, industrial, and healthcare sectors, reflecting fundamental differences in investment strategies.
- Long-Term Performance Analysis: Although IEFA excels in the short term, NZAC's return over the past five years is approximately 10% higher, indicating its potential for long-term investment, particularly for investors focused on sustainability.
- Market Volatility Risks: Investors should be aware that IEFA exhibits higher volatility, especially during external market changes, which can significantly impact returns, making it crucial to stay informed about relevant international economic news.
See More
Investment Comparison Between IEFA and NZAC
- Expense Ratio Advantage: IEFA charges an annual expense ratio of 0.07%, significantly lower than NZAC's 0.12%, making IEFA more attractive in terms of cost efficiency, particularly for cost-conscious investors who can save more over the long term.
- Dividend Yield Difference: With a dividend yield of 3.4%, IEFA nearly doubles NZAC's 1.9%, creating a notable gap that positions IEFA as the preferred choice for income-focused investors, especially in the current low-interest-rate environment.
- Market Performance Comparison: Over the past year, IEFA outperformed NZAC in returns, yet NZAC's five-year performance exceeds IEFA by approximately 10%, indicating that while IEFA may excel in the short term, long-term investors might favor NZAC's stability.
- Portfolio Composition Differences: IEFA primarily invests in developed markets with 2,589 holdings, focusing on financial services, industrials, and healthcare, whereas NZAC targets climate-aligned companies with 729 stocks, 32% in technology, highlighting significant strategic differences in their investment approaches.
See More
Broadcom: A Potential Market Leader by 2027
- Market Share Growth: Broadcom anticipates its AI semiconductor revenue will double year-over-year in Q1, making it the fastest-growing company in the AI computing space, showcasing its strong capability to capture market share and potentially challenge Nvidia.
- Client Base Expansion: By partnering directly with AI hyperscalers to design custom AI chips, Broadcom has attracted large clients, including Google, and expects more clients to finalize designs and purchase chips by 2026 and 2027, driving revenue growth.
- Optimistic Financial Outlook: Despite AI semiconductor revenue comprising less than half of its total, Wall Street analysts project a 52% revenue growth for FY 2026 and 39% for FY 2027, positioning Broadcom to potentially reach a $3 trillion market cap by the end of 2027.
- Significant Investment Value: Broadcom's stock is expected to double in the next two years, making it a clear
See More
Tesla and Waymo's Divergent Approaches to Autonomous Driving
- Elevated Safety Standards: Waymo's VP Srikanth Thirumalai stated in an interview that the standards for autonomous driving should exceed human capabilities, emphasizing that safety is paramount, with future efforts focused on reducing sensor costs and improving software quality to ensure product safety.
- Sensor System Optimization: Currently, Waymo employs a comprehensive system with 29 cameras, 5 lidars, and 6 radars to enhance AI perception, planning to reduce the number of sensors in future robotaxi models while iterating and innovating to lower costs and improve software performance.
- Tesla's AI Perspective: Tesla's VP of AI, Ashok Elluswamy, emphasized at the ScaledML Conference that autonomous driving should rely on cameras rather than sensors, arguing that the challenge lies in AI capabilities rather than sensor technology, highlighting the importance of information extraction.
- Ongoing Industry Debate: Despite differing views on autonomous driving technology, both Waymo and Tesla acknowledge the challenges in achieving fully safe autonomous driving, indicating that the debate within the industry continues to evolve.
See More
Nvidia vs. Oracle: Compelling Investment Stories
- Nvidia's Market Performance: Nvidia's stock has surged over 700% in the past three years, pushing its market capitalization beyond $4 trillion, making it the largest company globally, which highlights its dominant position in high-performance AI applications and attracts significant investor interest.
- Oracle's Market Challenges: Oracle, with a market cap of $440 billion, has seen its stock drop over 52% since last September, primarily due to high spending on AI infrastructure and a debt exceeding $100 billion, raising concerns about its financial health among investors.
- Financial Performance Highlights: Oracle's recent Q2 FY2026 earnings report revealed a 14% year-over-year revenue increase to $16.05 billion, with net income soaring 95% to $6.13 billion, including a $2.7 billion pre-tax gain, showcasing its strong growth potential in the cloud computing sector.
- Future Growth Expectations: Despite facing debt pressures, Oracle's forward price-to-earnings ratio stands at just 19.8, indicating that its stock is at a two-year low, and analysts expect significant revenue growth in the future, potentially providing a good buying opportunity for investors.
See More
Nvidia Stock Valuation Low, Potential for Rebound
- Valuation Drop: Nvidia's stock currently trades at a forward P/E ratio of 25, slightly above last spring's lows, yet the market's strong growth expectations could yield substantial returns for investors.
- Market Recovery: Despite a pullback in tech stocks since October, Nvidia's price is poised for significant growth in the coming years, particularly as the AI computing market continues to expand.
- Rising Capital Expenditure: AI hyperscalers have announced record capital expenditure plans for 2026, with global data center spending projected to reach $3 trillion to $4 trillion annually, positioning Nvidia as a key beneficiary.
- Strong Revenue Outlook: Analysts forecast a 52% revenue increase for Nvidia in fiscal 2027, indicating robust performance in the AI sector and sustained market demand, despite a slight slowdown in growth rate.
See More
Comparative Analysis of Climate-Focused ETFs
- Cost and Return Comparison: NZAC has an expense ratio of 0.12% compared to IEFA's 0.07%, and while NZAC's one-year return stands at 15.11%, IEFA significantly outperforms with 28.70%, highlighting IEFA's advantages in cost efficiency and yield.
- Holdings Structure Differences: NZAC holds 729 stocks with 32% in technology, featuring major companies like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, whereas IEFA tracks 2,589 stocks primarily in financial, industrial, and healthcare sectors, reflecting fundamental differences in investment strategies.
- Long-Term Performance Analysis: Although IEFA excels in the short term, NZAC's return over the past five years is approximately 10% higher, indicating its potential for long-term investment, particularly for investors focused on sustainability.
- Market Volatility Risks: Investors should be aware that IEFA exhibits higher volatility, especially during external market changes, which can significantly impact returns, making it crucial to stay informed about relevant international economic news.
See More
Investment Comparison Between IEFA and NZAC
- Expense Ratio Advantage: IEFA charges an annual expense ratio of 0.07%, significantly lower than NZAC's 0.12%, making IEFA more attractive in terms of cost efficiency, particularly for cost-conscious investors who can save more over the long term.
- Dividend Yield Difference: With a dividend yield of 3.4%, IEFA nearly doubles NZAC's 1.9%, creating a notable gap that positions IEFA as the preferred choice for income-focused investors, especially in the current low-interest-rate environment.
- Market Performance Comparison: Over the past year, IEFA outperformed NZAC in returns, yet NZAC's five-year performance exceeds IEFA by approximately 10%, indicating that while IEFA may excel in the short term, long-term investors might favor NZAC's stability.
- Portfolio Composition Differences: IEFA primarily invests in developed markets with 2,589 holdings, focusing on financial services, industrials, and healthcare, whereas NZAC targets climate-aligned companies with 729 stocks, 32% in technology, highlighting significant strategic differences in their investment approaches.
See More
Broadcom: A Potential Market Leader by 2027
- Market Share Growth: Broadcom anticipates its AI semiconductor revenue will double year-over-year in Q1, making it the fastest-growing company in the AI computing space, showcasing its strong capability to capture market share and potentially challenge Nvidia.
- Client Base Expansion: By partnering directly with AI hyperscalers to design custom AI chips, Broadcom has attracted large clients, including Google, and expects more clients to finalize designs and purchase chips by 2026 and 2027, driving revenue growth.
- Optimistic Financial Outlook: Despite AI semiconductor revenue comprising less than half of its total, Wall Street analysts project a 52% revenue growth for FY 2026 and 39% for FY 2027, positioning Broadcom to potentially reach a $3 trillion market cap by the end of 2027.
- Significant Investment Value: Broadcom's stock is expected to double in the next two years, making it a clear
See More
Tesla and Waymo's Divergent Approaches to Autonomous Driving
- Elevated Safety Standards: Waymo's VP Srikanth Thirumalai stated in an interview that the standards for autonomous driving should exceed human capabilities, emphasizing that safety is paramount, with future efforts focused on reducing sensor costs and improving software quality to ensure product safety.
- Sensor System Optimization: Currently, Waymo employs a comprehensive system with 29 cameras, 5 lidars, and 6 radars to enhance AI perception, planning to reduce the number of sensors in future robotaxi models while iterating and innovating to lower costs and improve software performance.
- Tesla's AI Perspective: Tesla's VP of AI, Ashok Elluswamy, emphasized at the ScaledML Conference that autonomous driving should rely on cameras rather than sensors, arguing that the challenge lies in AI capabilities rather than sensor technology, highlighting the importance of information extraction.
- Ongoing Industry Debate: Despite differing views on autonomous driving technology, both Waymo and Tesla acknowledge the challenges in achieving fully safe autonomous driving, indicating that the debate within the industry continues to evolve.
See More
