Comparison of Fidelity and iShares Cryptocurrency ETFs
- Fund Size Comparison: Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) manages $12.3 billion in assets, significantly larger than iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) at $6.7 billion, indicating FBTC's dominant position in attracting institutional investor interest.
- Return and Risk Analysis: FBTC posted a one-year return of -21.4%, while ETHA achieved a 2.18% return, despite ETHA's maximum drawdown of -61.66%, highlighting the higher volatility and potential risks associated with ether.
- Investment Structure Characteristics: FBTC allocates nearly all its assets to bitcoin, while ETHA holds 100% ether, lacking diversification, which results in highly correlated performance during market fluctuations, necessitating careful selection by investors.
- Market Influencing Factors: FBTC is significantly influenced by institutional liquidity and overall market sentiment, whereas ETHA relies more on the usage of the Ethereum network and ecosystem growth, prompting investors to choose a crypto asset investment strategy aligned with their goals.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Analyst Views on ETHA
No data
About the author
Ethereum Price Targets and Market Predictions by Tom Lee
- Ethereum Price Targets: Tom Lee has set three price targets for Ethereum at $12,000, $22,000, and $62,000, contingent on it becoming the primary payment tool globally and Bitcoin reaching $250,000, which could significantly boost market confidence and attract more investors.
- Jane Street Earnings Forecast: Jane Street is expected to achieve $40 billion in net income this year with only 3,000 employees, showcasing its efficient operational model, which may prompt other financial institutions to consider similar business strategies.
- Banking Digital Transformation: Lee predicts that within the next decade, half of the world's largest banks will become native digital asset companies, a transformation that could reshape the financial landscape akin to Tesla and Amazon's disruption of traditional industries.
- BitMine Ethereum Holdings Increase: BitMine has recently raised its Ethereum holdings from 5.18 million ETH to 5.2 million ETH, although the pace of accumulation has slowed, the company still aims to reach 5% of the total supply by 2026, indicating strong confidence in Ethereum's long-term value.
US Bitcoin Spot ETF Attracted $532 Million in Net Inflows Yesterday, While Ethereum ETF Gained $61.3 Million.
Bitcoin Net Inflows: Yesterday's net inflows into U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs totaled $532 million, with significant contributions from BlackRock, Fidelity, and Morgan Stanley.
Ethereum Net Inflows: The net inflows into U.S. Ethereum spot ETFs reached $61.3 million, primarily driven by BlackRock and Fidelity.
BlackRock Contributions: BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF saw an inflow of $335 million, while its Ethereum ETF attracted $54.8 million.
Fidelity's Role: Fidelity's Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs contributed $184 million and $6.5 million, respectively, to the overall net inflows.
BlackRock Transfers 26,273 ETH and 226.677 BTC to Coinbase Prime
BlackRock's Ethereum Investment: BlackRock has deposited a total of 26,273 ETH, valued at approximately $59.89 million, into Coinbase Prime through its Ethereum ETF, ETHA.
BlackRock's Bitcoin Investment: Additionally, BlackRock has deposited 226.677 BTC, worth around $17.54 million, into Coinbase Prime via its Bitcoin ETF, IBIT.
Bitcoin ETF Recorded a $23.5 Million Net Inflow Yesterday, While Ethereum ETF Faced a $23.7 Million Net Outflow.
Bitcoin ETF Net Inflow: The US Bitcoin spot ETF recorded a net inflow of $23.5 million, with significant contributions from IBIT and FBTC, which saw inflows of $19.1 million and $26.6 million, respectively.
Ethereum ETF Outflow: The Ethereum ETF experienced a net outflow of $23.7 million, while ETHA faced a larger outflow of $50.6 million, indicating a shift in investor sentiment.
Comparison of VanEck and iShares Single-Crypto ETFs
- Cost Comparison: VanEck's HODL ETF has an expense ratio of 0.20%, making it slightly more cost-effective than iShares' ETHA ETF at 0.25%, which can enhance returns for long-term holders by reducing costs.
- Performance Discrepancy: As of April 24, 2026, HODL reported a one-year return of -18.6%, while ETHA achieved a positive return of 28.16%, highlighting significant performance differences that investors should carefully consider when making choices.
- Maximum Drawdown Analysis: HODL's maximum one-year drawdown stands at 49.25%, compared to ETHA's 64.02%, indicating that while ETHA offers higher returns, it also comes with significantly increased risk, necessitating careful risk assessment by investors.
- Assets Under Management: ETHA boasts $7.4 billion in assets under management, significantly larger than HODL's $1.3 billion, with this scale difference potentially impacting liquidity and market acceptance, factors that investors should weigh in their decision-making process.
Comparison of iShares Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs
- Cost and Size: Both iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) and Ethereum ETF (ETHA) charge a 0.25% expense ratio, with IBIT managing $63.7 billion in assets compared to ETHA's $7.6 billion, indicating IBIT's dominant market position.
- Performance Discrepancy: As of April 22, 2026, IBIT has a one-year return of -14.1%, while ETHA has surged by 40.7%, reflecting Ethereum's strong performance despite ETHA's maximum drawdown of -64.02%.
- Risk Assessment: IBIT's maximum drawdown stands at -49.36%, highlighting greater volatility in ETHA, which has a shorter history of just 1.8 years, necessitating careful consideration of risk tolerance when choosing between the two.
- Investment Convenience: Both ETFs can be traded within standard brokerage accounts, eliminating the need for crypto wallets and private key management, and they are eligible for tax-advantaged accounts, although investors incur a 0.25% annual fee.
Ethereum Price Targets and Market Predictions by Tom Lee
- Ethereum Price Targets: Tom Lee has set three price targets for Ethereum at $12,000, $22,000, and $62,000, contingent on it becoming the primary payment tool globally and Bitcoin reaching $250,000, which could significantly boost market confidence and attract more investors.
- Jane Street Earnings Forecast: Jane Street is expected to achieve $40 billion in net income this year with only 3,000 employees, showcasing its efficient operational model, which may prompt other financial institutions to consider similar business strategies.
- Banking Digital Transformation: Lee predicts that within the next decade, half of the world's largest banks will become native digital asset companies, a transformation that could reshape the financial landscape akin to Tesla and Amazon's disruption of traditional industries.
- BitMine Ethereum Holdings Increase: BitMine has recently raised its Ethereum holdings from 5.18 million ETH to 5.2 million ETH, although the pace of accumulation has slowed, the company still aims to reach 5% of the total supply by 2026, indicating strong confidence in Ethereum's long-term value.
US Bitcoin Spot ETF Attracted $532 Million in Net Inflows Yesterday, While Ethereum ETF Gained $61.3 Million.
Bitcoin Net Inflows: Yesterday's net inflows into U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs totaled $532 million, with significant contributions from BlackRock, Fidelity, and Morgan Stanley.
Ethereum Net Inflows: The net inflows into U.S. Ethereum spot ETFs reached $61.3 million, primarily driven by BlackRock and Fidelity.
BlackRock Contributions: BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF saw an inflow of $335 million, while its Ethereum ETF attracted $54.8 million.
Fidelity's Role: Fidelity's Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs contributed $184 million and $6.5 million, respectively, to the overall net inflows.
BlackRock Transfers 26,273 ETH and 226.677 BTC to Coinbase Prime
BlackRock's Ethereum Investment: BlackRock has deposited a total of 26,273 ETH, valued at approximately $59.89 million, into Coinbase Prime through its Ethereum ETF, ETHA.
BlackRock's Bitcoin Investment: Additionally, BlackRock has deposited 226.677 BTC, worth around $17.54 million, into Coinbase Prime via its Bitcoin ETF, IBIT.
Bitcoin ETF Recorded a $23.5 Million Net Inflow Yesterday, While Ethereum ETF Faced a $23.7 Million Net Outflow.
Bitcoin ETF Net Inflow: The US Bitcoin spot ETF recorded a net inflow of $23.5 million, with significant contributions from IBIT and FBTC, which saw inflows of $19.1 million and $26.6 million, respectively.
Ethereum ETF Outflow: The Ethereum ETF experienced a net outflow of $23.7 million, while ETHA faced a larger outflow of $50.6 million, indicating a shift in investor sentiment.
Comparison of VanEck and iShares Single-Crypto ETFs
- Cost Comparison: VanEck's HODL ETF has an expense ratio of 0.20%, making it slightly more cost-effective than iShares' ETHA ETF at 0.25%, which can enhance returns for long-term holders by reducing costs.
- Performance Discrepancy: As of April 24, 2026, HODL reported a one-year return of -18.6%, while ETHA achieved a positive return of 28.16%, highlighting significant performance differences that investors should carefully consider when making choices.
- Maximum Drawdown Analysis: HODL's maximum one-year drawdown stands at 49.25%, compared to ETHA's 64.02%, indicating that while ETHA offers higher returns, it also comes with significantly increased risk, necessitating careful risk assessment by investors.
- Assets Under Management: ETHA boasts $7.4 billion in assets under management, significantly larger than HODL's $1.3 billion, with this scale difference potentially impacting liquidity and market acceptance, factors that investors should weigh in their decision-making process.
Comparison of iShares Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs
- Cost and Size: Both iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) and Ethereum ETF (ETHA) charge a 0.25% expense ratio, with IBIT managing $63.7 billion in assets compared to ETHA's $7.6 billion, indicating IBIT's dominant market position.
- Performance Discrepancy: As of April 22, 2026, IBIT has a one-year return of -14.1%, while ETHA has surged by 40.7%, reflecting Ethereum's strong performance despite ETHA's maximum drawdown of -64.02%.
- Risk Assessment: IBIT's maximum drawdown stands at -49.36%, highlighting greater volatility in ETHA, which has a shorter history of just 1.8 years, necessitating careful consideration of risk tolerance when choosing between the two.
- Investment Convenience: Both ETFs can be traded within standard brokerage accounts, eliminating the need for crypto wallets and private key management, and they are eligible for tax-advantaged accounts, although investors incur a 0.25% annual fee.
