What stock do I trade today

Screening Filters

1. Market Cap ≥ $10,000,000,000

   • Purpose: Restrict results to large‑cap companies.
   • Rationale: KDP (Keurig Dr Pepper) is a large‑cap stock. To decide “what to do with KDP today,” analysts naturally compare it against similar‑size peers. Large‑caps tend to have more stable earnings, better liquidity, and more analyst coverage, making valuation and risk comparisons more meaningful.

2. Beta: LowRisk or ModerateRisk

   • Purpose: Focus on stocks with relatively low to moderate volatility versus the market.
   • Rationale: KDP is typically a lower‑beta, defensive consumer name. Filtering for low/moderate beta finds comparable “defensive” beverage stocks, not highly speculative or hyper‑cyclical names. This lets you see how KDP stacks up against peers with similar risk profiles when deciding whether to hold, buy more, or sell.

3. Sector: Food & Beverages

   • Purpose: Narrow to companies in the same broad sector as KDP.
   • Rationale: Sector context is crucial. Macroeconomic trends (inflation in input costs, consumer spending shifts, etc.) hit sectors differently. By staying within Food & Beverages, you can judge whether KDP’s valuation and performance are in line with its sector, or whether it’s an outlier that might be mispriced.

4. Industry: Beverages

   • Purpose: Further narrow to KDP’s direct industry peers.
   • Rationale: Within Food & Beverages, beverage companies (soft drinks, coffee, bottled drinks) have different growth, margin, and competitive dynamics than, say, packaged foods. Comparing KDP to beverage‑only peers is the cleanest way to assess whether KDP is cheap/expensive, under/overperforming, and thus what you might do with it today.

5. Exchange: XNYS, XNAS, XASE (Major U.S. Exchanges)

   • Purpose: Limit to U.S.-listed companies on major exchanges.
   • Rationale: KDP trades in the U.S., and U.S.-listed peers have comparable reporting standards, accounting rules, and investor bases. This makes valuation metrics (like P/E and dividend yield) more directly comparable and reduces distortions from different regulatory or market structures.

6. P/E (TTM) between 15 and 25

   • Purpose: Find beverage peers with a “normal” to moderately premium valuation range.
   • Rationale: To decide what to do with KDP, you want to know if its P/E is out of line with reasonable peers. A 15–25 range captures typical valuations for mature, profitable consumer beverage companies—not distressed (very low P/E) or speculative hyper‑growth (very high P/E) names. This helps frame whether KDP is relatively cheap or expensive within a realistic peer set.

7. Dividend Yield (TTM) between 2% and 4%

   • Purpose: Focus on income‑generating beverage stocks with yields similar to KDP’s profile.
   • Rationale: KDP is often held partly for its dividend as a defensive, income‑oriented consumer stock. Limiting peers to those yielding 2–4% keeps the comparison universe to companies offering a similar income profile—not ultra‑low yield growth stocks or distressed ultra‑high yielder “value traps.” This is key for deciding whether KDP’s income + valuation tradeoff is attractive relative to close peers.

Why Results Match Your Question

• Your question (“What should I do with KDP today?”) is fundamentally about current attractiveness vs. close peers. These filters construct a tight peer group: large‑cap, U.S.-listed, beverage companies with similar risk (beta), valuation (P/E), and dividend characteristics.
• By seeing where KDP sits against this filtered set—on valuation, yield, and risk—you can better judge whether KDP is:
  • fairly valued vs. peers (lean toward hold),
  • cheap vs. peers (potential buy/add), or
  • expensive with no compensating advantages (potential trim/sell).

So each filter works to isolate a realistic, apples‑to‑apples comparison universe, which is exactly what you need to make an informed decision about KDP today.