Screening Filters
Monthly Average Dollar Volume ≥ $1,000,000
- Purpose: Focus on liquid ETFs that are easy to buy and sell.
- Rationale:
- When someone broadly asks “What ETF should I consider buying?”, it’s reasonable to assume they want something practical to trade, not obscure or thinly traded funds.
- A minimum of $1M in average dollar volume helps:
- Reduce bid‑ask spreads (you lose less on trading costs).
- Make it easier to enter or exit positions without moving the price much.
- This filter steers you toward commonly used, more established ETFs.
YTD Price Change ≥ 0%
- Purpose: Exclude ETFs that are down year‑to‑date, favoring those at least holding or gaining.
- Rationale:
- With a general question like yours, a sensible default is to avoid ETFs that are currently in a downtrend or underperforming the market.
- Requiring non‑negative YTD performance:
- Focuses on ETFs that are not currently losing ground.
- Tends to filter out structurally weak or out‑of‑favor segments, unless there’s a clear reason to target them.
Theme: Large Cap Blend Equities
- Purpose: Target broad, core stock market exposure (large-cap “core” or “blend” funds).
- Rationale:
- When someone says “What ETF should I consider buying?” without specifying niche themes, sectors, or high risk/high reward ideas, the most natural match is core market exposure.
- “Large Cap Blend” means:
- Large, established companies (generally more stable than small caps).
- A mix of growth and value (a “core” holding, not a style bet).
- These are the types of ETFs often used as the backbone of long‑term portfolios (e.g., S&P 500 or total U.S. large-cap funds).
Stock Position Percentage > 90%
- Purpose: Ensure the ETF is primarily invested in stocks, not bonds, cash, or derivatives.
- Rationale:
- Many investors asking about “an ETF to buy” typically mean an equity ETF, unless they specify bonds, commodities, or alternatives.
- Requiring >90% in stocks:
- Avoids funds with large cash buffers or complex derivative overlays.
- Delivers clear, direct equity exposure rather than hybrid or opaque strategies.
- This aligns with the idea of a straightforward, stock-based investment.
Expense Ratio ≤ 0.07
- Purpose: Limit results to low-cost ETFs.
- Rationale:
- For a general “What should I consider buying?” question, cost efficiency is one of the most universally important criteria.
- A max expense ratio of 0.07 (7 bps) is very strict and typically captures:
- Large, mainstream index ETFs (e.g., S&P 500, total market, broad large-cap) from major providers.
- Funds designed as core holdings, not niche, high-fee strategies.
- Lower fees increase the share of returns you keep, which is especially important for long-term investors.
Why Results Match Your Question
- The filters collectively point to core, broad-market, large-cap equity ETFs that are:
- Highly liquid (easier trading, lower implicit costs).
- Low-cost, suitable as long-term holdings.
- Mostly or fully invested in stocks, giving clear equity exposure.
- Showing at least non-negative recent performance, avoiding obvious current laggards.
In other words, for a general “Which ETF should I consider?” question, these filters narrow the universe down to mainstream, diversified, low-fee stock ETFs that many investors use as foundational positions in a portfolio.
This list is generated based on data from one or more third party data providers. It is provided for informational purposes only by Intellectia.AI, and is not investment advice or a recommendation. Intellectia does not make any warranty or guarantee relating to the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of any third-party information, and the provision of this information does not constitute a recommendation.