Screening Filters
Market Cap ≥ $10B (market_cap: {'min': '10000000000'})
- Purpose: Focus on large, established energy companies.
- Rationale: When someone asks “Which energy stock should I consider buying?”, they’re often looking for relatively stable, well-known names rather than tiny, speculative plays. A $10B+ market cap narrows the list to major players with:
- More diversified operations
- Better access to capital
- Greater analyst coverage and transparency
Price Above 200-Day Moving Average (moving_average_relationship: ['PriceAboveMA200'])
- Purpose: Prefer stocks in a longer-term uptrend or at least not in a prolonged downtrend.
- Rationale: The 200-day moving average is a common technical indicator for long-term trend. Filtering for price above this level:
- Avoids many stocks in sustained decline
- Focuses on names that the market is currently rewarding
- Aligns with a “don’t fight the tape” approach when considering new buys
Sector = Energy / Fossil Fuels / Renewable Energy (sector: [...])
- Purpose: Restrict the universe specifically to energy-related sectors.
- Rationale: This directly addresses “energy stock” by ensuring:
- All candidates operate in the broad energy space—traditional (oil & gas) or renewable
- You’re not getting unrelated sectors that just happen to have similar financial metrics
Industry = Oil & Gas / Equipment & Services / Renewable Energy (industry: [...])
- Purpose: Further refine the search to core energy business lines.
- Rationale: Within the broad sector, this locks in companies that:
- Produce or explore for oil & gas
- Provide essential services/equipment to the energy industry
- Operate in renewables (solar, wind, etc.)
This removes tangential or diversified conglomerates that only have minor energy exposure.
P/E (TTM) Between 5 and 20 (pe_ttm: {'min': '5', 'max': '20'})
- Purpose: Target reasonably valued companies, avoiding both extremes of ultra-cheap and ultra-expensive.
- Rationale:
- Min 5: Helps exclude potentially distressed or anomalous companies with extremely low P/Es that may be “value traps” (e.g., earnings about to collapse).
- Max 20: Avoids overly expensive names where a lot of growth may already be priced in, which can be risky in a cyclical sector like energy.
Overall, this range aims for “reasonable valuation” when considering a buy.
Dividend Yield (TTM) Between 2% and 7% (dividend_yield_ttm: {'min': '2', 'max': '7'})
- Purpose: Focus on income-producing energy stocks with sustainable-looking yields.
- Rationale:
- Min 2%: Ensures the stock offers a meaningful level of income, which is common and often desirable in energy.
- Max 7%: Extremely high yields can signal distress or an unsustainably high payout; capping at 7% aims to avoid likely “yield traps.”
This filter picks names that combine potential capital appreciation with ongoing cash returns.
Why Results Match Your Question
- You asked for energy stocks to consider buying; the sector and industry filters ensure the list is purely energy-focused (oil & gas and renewables).
- The market cap and dividend yield filters lean toward larger, more established, income-generating companies, which are typical candidates for long-term investors.
- The P/E range emphasizes reasonable valuations, especially important in a cyclical sector.
- The price above 200-day moving average adds a trend/technical health check, so you’re looking at energy stocks that the market is currently favoring rather than those deeply out of favor.
Together, these filters create a focused list of sizable, reasonably valued, dividend-paying energy companies that are in a generally positive price trend—sensible candidates for further research when considering an energy stock to buy.
This list is generated based on data from one or more third party data providers. It is provided for informational purposes only by Intellectia.AI, and is not investment advice or a recommendation. Intellectia does not make any warranty or guarantee relating to the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of any third-party information, and the provision of this information does not constitute a recommendation.