Screening Filters
Price ≤ $1
Theme: “AI Beneficiary”
Region: United States
Exchanges: XNYS, XNAS, XASE (NYSE, NASDAQ, NYSE American)
Yes, the filters line up well with what you asked:
themes: ["AI Beneficiary"] price: { max: "1" } region: ["United States"] and list_exchange: ["XNYS", "XNAS", "XASE"]You did not request any additional constraints (like market cap, volume, or profitability), so none were added.
We do not see any part of your request that we cannot support with the current filtering framework. The issue is not with unsupported indicators, but with how tight the combination of filters is.
No stocks were found that meet all of these conditions simultaneously:
This likely happened because:
AI-tagged stocks tend to be above $1:
Many AI-related companies (especially those clearly identifiable and tagged by data providers) are larger, more established names that rarely trade below $1 for long, if ever.
Penny AI stocks may trade OTC, not on major exchanges:
The very small, speculative “AI” plays that do trade under $1 are often on OTC or pink sheet markets, which are excluded by our exchange filter. That removes a big chunk of the true penny-stock universe.
Theme tagging is selective:
The “AI Beneficiary” theme only covers companies that meet certain criteria, so:
Together, those constraints make the screen very strict, which is why you’re seeing no matches.
Are you willing to relax or modify any of the criteria? For example, we could:
If you tell me which constraints you’re most flexible on—price, type of AI exposure, or exchange quality—I can suggest a revised filter setup that’s more likely to return a useful list.
This is a natural language screener issue. Our AI identifies and quantifies criteria, auto-filters ranges to match intent, and displays conditions, parameters, and results below, with 0 candidates fitting the screener.
The list includes top performers like , among others. These stocks are representative examples from the screener results.