Screening Filters
price_change_pct: { "min": "0" }
- Purpose: Include only stocks that are up on the day (i.e., positive percentage price change).
- Rationale:
- You asked for the leading percentage gainer in the US market, which by definition must have a positive price change.
- Setting a minimum of 0% filters out all decliners and flat movers, leaving only gainers.
- Once you have this subset, you can rank them by
price_change_pct in descending order to find the top gainer.
list_exchange: ["XNYS", "XNAS", "XASE"]
- Purpose: Limit the universe to stocks listed on the main US exchanges:
- XNYS = New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
- XNAS = NASDAQ
- XASE = NYSE American (formerly AMEX)
- Rationale:
- You specified the US stock market, which is most commonly represented by these primary exchanges.
- This avoids including over-the-counter (OTC) or foreign exchanges, which would not match your “US stock market” focus.
- These exchanges cover the vast majority of actively traded, regulated US equities, where “leading percentage gainer” is usually measured.
Why Results Match:
- The US focus in your request is addressed by restricting to US-listed stocks on NYSE, NASDAQ, and NYSE American via
list_exchange.
- The “leading percentage gainer” concept is addressed by:
- Filtering to only positive movers with
price_change_pct ≥ 0.
- From that set, the stock with the highest
price_change_pct on the day would be the leading gainer.
The filters don’t by themselves pick the single top stock; instead, they define the correct universe (US-listed gainers). Ranking that universe by price_change_pct will then identify the exact leading percentage gainer you’re asking about.
This list is generated based on data from one or more third party data providers. It is provided for informational purposes only by Intellectia.AI, and is not investment advice or a recommendation. Intellectia does not make any warranty or guarantee relating to the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of any third-party information, and the provision of this information does not constitute a recommendation.