I need only top 5-8 picks with no overlap

Screening Filters

1. PriceAboveMA200 (Moving Average Relationship)

   • Purpose: Select ETFs whose current price is above their 200‑day moving average.
   • Rationale:
     • You want “growth”, “stability” and “compounding”.
     • Price above the 200‑day MA is a classic way to filter for ETFs in a longer‑term uptrend rather than in a downtrend or sideways pattern.
     • This helps tilt the list toward ETFs that are currently behaving like strong compounders (upward trend) instead of those that are lagging.

2. Year Price Change ≥ 15%

   • Purpose: Only include ETFs that have gained at least 15% over the past year.
   • Rationale:
     • You’re asking for “good compounding” plus growth and profitability.
     • A minimum 1‑year return threshold pushes out underperformers and funds that may be stable but not truly compounding at an attractive rate.
     • While past performance is not a guarantee, strong trailing performance is one reasonable proxy for recent “compounding power.”

3. Theme: Large Cap Blend Equities

   • Purpose: Focus on diversified large‑cap equity ETFs (typically broad market or core holdings).
   • Rationale:
     • Large caps tend to provide more stability and business quality (profitability and durable cash flows) than small, speculative segments.
     • “Blend” (growth + value) avoids over‑concentration in either pure growth or pure value, giving a balanced profile that can support long‑term compounding with fewer extreme drawdowns.
     • This is very consistent with your desire for “growth and stability and profitability and compundability” rather than high‑risk niche themes.

4. Stock_Position_Pct: MoreThan90Pct

   • Purpose: Select ETFs that invest more than 90% of their assets in stocks (equities).
   • Rationale:
     • You’re targeting equity‑driven compounding, not bond or mixed‑asset products.
     • Keeping >90% in stocks ensures the ETF is truly equity‑focused, which historically is where most long‑term compounding comes from.
     • This avoids “dilution” of returns by large bond or cash allocations that could dampen growth.

5. Expense Ratio ≤ 0.07

   • Purpose: Limit the ETFs to very low‑cost funds.
   • Rationale:
     • Compounding is highly sensitive to fees. A 0.10–0.50% annual fee difference can materially reduce long‑term outcomes.
     • Capping expenses at 0.07% steers you to ultra‑low‑cost, usually large and liquid core ETFs.
     • This directly serves your goal of maximizing compounding and “profitability” from an investor’s perspective, by minimizing fee drag.

Why These Results Match What You Asked For

• Growth & Compounding:

  • PriceAboveMA200 + 1‑year return ≥15% target ETFs that are currently performing well and compounding recently, rather than flat or lagging funds.

• Stability & Quality:

  • The “Large Cap Blend Equities” focus plus >90% equities narrows the field to broad, core equity ETFs with diversified large, profitable companies.

• Profitability & Investor-Friendly Structure:

  • Very low expense ratios (≤0.07%) increase the share of gross returns that actually accrue to you, supporting better long‑term compounding.

• Non-overlap consideration:

  • These filters find high‑quality core equity ETFs. Truly enforcing “no overlap” (minimal overlap in underlying holdings) requires a second step: comparing each ETF’s top holdings and sector weights.
  • The screener filters you see above don’t by themselves enforce non‑overlap; they generate a high‑quality candidate list from which 5–8 ETFs with low overlap can then be selected by analyzing holdings.

In summary, the filters collectively narrow the universe to low‑cost, large‑cap, equity‑focused ETFs that are currently performing well and structurally suited for long‑term compounding. The “no overlap” constraint will be handled through holding‑level comparison after this screen.