Screening Filters
Market Cap ≥ $2,000,000,000 (Large / Mid Caps)
- Purpose: Focus on established, more stable copper-related companies instead of tiny, speculative explorers.
- Rationale:
- Many major copper producers and diversified miners (with large copper exposure) are multi‑billion‑dollar companies.
- This helps surface better-known copper plays (e.g., diversified base-metal miners) rather than illiquid microcaps whose prices can be driven more by hype than by actual copper fundamentals.
Share Price ≥ $3
- Purpose: Avoid penny stocks and very low‑priced miners.
- Rationale:
- Very low-priced mining stocks are often junior explorers, not established copper producers.
- A $3+ threshold helps filter out many highly speculative names and keeps the list to more investable copper-related stocks.
Monthly Average Dollar Volume ≥ $500,000
- Purpose: Ensure the stocks are reasonably liquid and tradable.
- Rationale:
- Copper/mining names can be very illiquid; this filter ensures there’s enough trading volume (in dollar terms) so an investor can realistically enter and exit positions.
- It also tends to favor more followed and institutionally owned copper and base‑metal miners.
Industry = “Metals & Mining”
- Purpose: Restrict results to companies whose primary business is extracting and processing metals, including copper.
- Rationale:
- Copper producers, base‑metal miners, and diversified miners with significant copper exposure are all classified under Metals & Mining.
- This is the core filter that ties directly to your query about “stocks related to copper,” since copper miners sit squarely in this industry.
Region = “US”
- Purpose: Focus on companies listed in the U.S. market.
- Rationale:
- Many large copper and base‑metal miners either are U.S. companies or list their primary/secondary shares in the U.S.
- For most investors, U.S.-listed names are easier to access, with better disclosures and analyst coverage.
- This may exclude some non‑U.S. listed copper producers (e.g., in Canada, Chile, Australia), but it makes the list more practical for a typical U.S.-based investor.
Exchange = XNYS, XNAS (NYSE & NASDAQ)
- Purpose: Limit to major U.S. exchanges.
- Rationale:
- Most significant copper-related stocks that U.S. investors trade are on NYSE or NASDAQ, including ADRs of major foreign miners.
- Excluding OTC and smaller exchanges further improves liquidity and reporting quality, which is useful when screening for actionable copper plays.
Theme = “Mining”
- Purpose: Tighten the focus within Metals & Mining to actively mining companies rather than tangential metal-related businesses.
- Rationale:
- “Metals & Mining” can include royalty companies, metal processors, or industrials loosely tied to metals.
- The “Mining” theme is a more targeted tag that helps ensure the results are actual miners—where revenue and earnings are directly influenced by commodity prices like copper.
- This aligns especially well with your interest in “stocks related to copper,” since miners’ fortunes tend to move with copper price cycles.
Why Results Match Your Query (“Stocks Related to Copper”)
- By combining Industry = Metals & Mining with the Mining theme, the screener zeroes in on actual mining companies whose business is extracting metals, including copper.
- The market cap, price, and liquidity filters emphasize established, tradable copper/base‑metal miners rather than tiny, speculative exploration plays.
- Limiting to U.S.-listed (NYSE/NASDAQ) names makes the results more accessible and better covered, while still capturing many of the major global copper-related companies via U.S. listings or ADRs.
Together, these filters are designed to surface investable, reasonably liquid mining stocks that are most likely to have meaningful exposure to copper, rather than a broad, unfocused list of metal-related or microcap names.
This list is generated based on data from one or more third party data providers. It is provided for informational purposes only by Intellectia.AI, and is not investment advice or a recommendation. Intellectia does not make any warranty or guarantee relating to the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of any third-party information, and the provision of this information does not constitute a recommendation.