Screening Filters
monthly_average_dollar_volume ≥ 2,000,000
- Purpose: Ensure the ETF is highly tradable and liquid.
- Rationale:
- A high average dollar volume means it’s easy to buy and sell the ETF without significantly moving the price.
- For someone asking for the “best ETF to buy,” poor liquidity would be a clear negative (wider bid–ask spreads, harder exits).
- This filter prioritizes ETFs that are actively used by many investors and institutions, which typically corresponds to more established, mainstream products.
themes: Large Cap Blend Equities
- Purpose: Focus on broad, core stock-market exposure rather than niche or speculative themes.
- Rationale:
- “Large Cap Blend” usually means a diversified basket of large, stable companies, mixing both growth and value styles—essentially a core market fund.
- When someone asks for the “best ETF to buy,” they are often looking for a core, long-term holding rather than a sector bet or exotic strategy.
- This theme aligns with widely used benchmark ETFs (e.g., S&P 500 / total market–style exposure) that are often considered foundational in portfolios.
stock_position_pct: MoreThan90Pct
- Purpose: Ensure the ETF is mostly invested in actual stocks, not sitting in cash or using primarily derivatives.
- Rationale:
- An ETF that holds >90% in stocks is giving you the intended equity exposure, not diluting it with large cash positions or complex overlays.
- This is important when the goal is to find a straightforward “best ETF” for equity exposure—less complexity, more direct linkage to the stock market.
- It helps filter out products that may be more like trading instruments or heavily hedged rather than long-term investment vehicles.
expense_ratio ≤ 0.07 (7 bps)
- Purpose: Limit results to very low-cost ETFs.
- Rationale:
- Cost is one of the most reliable predictors of better long-term net performance: lower fees leave more returns in your pocket.
- For a “best ETF to buy,” high expenses are a major drawback, especially for broad, passive exposure where cheap alternatives exist.
- A cap of 0.07% essentially targets the most competitive, large-scale index ETFs from major providers.
inception_date ≤ 2015-01-01
- Purpose: Require a long and established track record (roughly 10+ years).
- Rationale:
- Older ETFs have lived through multiple market environments (bull, bear, volatility spikes), so investors can better assess behavior and tracking quality.
- Newer ETFs may be unproven, have growing pains (low assets, wider spreads), or even close—undesirable traits for a “best ETF” candidate.
- This filter favors mature, time-tested funds that have demonstrated stability and consistent operation.
Why Results Match the User’s Request (“best ETF to buy”)
- The screen targets broad, large-cap, diversified equity ETFs, which are typically considered core building blocks in a portfolio rather than speculative bets.
- High liquidity and a long track record ensure the ETFs are established, widely used, and easier to enter and exit.
- A very low expense ratio focuses on funds that are cost-efficient, an essential criterion for long-term “best-in-class” ETFs.
- Requiring >90% in stocks ensures you get clear, straightforward equity exposure, which is usually what investors mean when they ask for the “best ETF to buy.”
Together, these filters narrow the universe to mainstream, low-cost, liquid, long-standing large-cap equity ETFs that are well-suited as core holdings—precisely the type of products most professionals would start with when asked for a “best ETF” candidate.
This list is generated based on data from one or more third party data providers. It is provided for informational purposes only by Intellectia.AI, and is not investment advice or a recommendation. Intellectia does not make any warranty or guarantee relating to the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of any third-party information, and the provision of this information does not constitute a recommendation.