Bitcoin Mining Environmental Debate Reignited as Expert Refutes Nine Myths
Written by Ohris M. Greyoon, Blockchain & Crypto Expert
- Resource Consumption Debate: ESG expert Daniel Batten highlights that Bitcoin mining's energy use is not proportional to transaction volume, refuting common claims of resource wastage, which helps reshape public misconceptions about Bitcoin.
- Grid Stability: Batten explains that Bitcoin mining enhances grid stability through flexible load management, particularly in renewable-heavy regions like Texas, demonstrating its support for renewable energy integration.
- Electricity Price Impact: Batten notes that there is little evidence to suggest Bitcoin mining drives up electricity prices; rather, it may lower costs by increasing demand for renewable energy, as illustrated by projects like Gridless in Africa.
- Sustainable Energy Usage: Over 50% of Bitcoin mining operations now utilize sustainable energy, with Batten emphasizing that this trend indicates a decreasing carbon emissions intensity, countering the narrative of a high carbon footprint associated with Bitcoin mining.
About the author

Ohris M. Greyoon
Ohris M. Greyoon holds a Master’s in Computer Science from MIT and has 10 years of experience in blockchain technology and cryptocurrency markets. A pioneer in decentralized finance (DeFi) analysis, he leads Intellectia’s Crypto News, offering cutting-edge insights into digital assets.







