New Research Challenges Bitcoin Mining's Environmental Impact Claims
Written by Ohris M. Greyoon, Blockchain & Crypto Expert
- Research Challenges Assumptions: ESG researcher Daniel Batten argues that nine widely cited claims about Bitcoin mining contradict scientific evidence, indicating a limited understanding of modern energy systems, which could influence investor perceptions of Bitcoin.
- Electricity Price Impact: Batten emphasizes that mining does not drive up electricity prices; in some regions, it has lowered prices by improving grid efficiency, potentially changing public negative perceptions of Bitcoin mining.
- Support for Renewable Energy: Studies show that Bitcoin mining can absorb excess renewable energy and reduce waste, thereby supporting the development of renewable infrastructure and enhancing its social value.
- Environmental Footprint Analysis: Batten notes that Bitcoin mining has zero direct emissions, with indirect electricity-related emissions surpassing a 50% sustainable energy usage threshold, indicating significant progress in the industry's environmental sustainability efforts.
About the author

Ohris M. Greyoon
Ohris M. Greyoon holds a Master’s in Computer Science from MIT and has 10 years of experience in blockchain technology and cryptocurrency markets. A pioneer in decentralized finance (DeFi) analysis, he leads Intellectia’s Crypto News, offering cutting-edge insights into digital assets.






