FTC Sues Uber Over Deceptive Billing Practices

Updated: 21 Apr 25
3mins
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has sued Uber, accusing the company of deceptive billing and cancellation practices related to its Uber One subscription service. The lawsuit alleges that Uber charged customers without proper consent, made cancellations difficult despite advertising "cancel anytime," and failed to deliver promised savings. Uber denies the claims, asserting its processes comply with legal standards. The case highlights growing regulatory scrutiny of subscription-based services.

FTC Allegations Against Uber

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a lawsuit against Uber, accusing the company of engaging in deceptive practices related to its Uber One subscription service. The allegations include claims that Uber charged customers without obtaining proper consent and failed to honor its "cancel anytime" marketing promise. According to the FTC, users encountered significant obstacles when attempting to cancel their subscriptions, including navigating through as many as 23 screens and performing 32 actions to successfully terminate their membership. Some users reportedly had to contact customer support for cancellation, only to face delays and continued charges during the waiting period. Additionally, the FTC highlighted instances where customers were enrolled in paid subscriptions after free trials without explicit authorization.

Uber's Defense and Legal Response

Uber has refuted the FTC’s claims, asserting that its subscription processes adhere to legal standards and are transparent for consumers. The company emphasized that users can cancel their Uber One membership in-app within approximately 20 seconds. Uber's legal team, including former FTC officials, criticized the regulatory body's investigation as rushed and based on misunderstandings of the company's practices. In a public statement, Uber expressed confidence that courts would uphold its compliance with laws governing subscriptions and consumer consent. The company also rejected allegations of failing to deliver promised savings, noting that its subscription costs and benefits are clearly communicated to users.

Regulatory and Consumer Implications

The FTC's lawsuit against Uber is part of a broader regulatory push to address deceptive practices in subscription-based business models. Regulators are increasingly scrutinizing how companies obtain user consent, communicate terms, and handle cancellations. This case underscores growing concerns over the transparency and fairness of subscription services, which have become a significant revenue stream for many businesses. For consumers, such legal actions highlight the importance of reading terms carefully and monitoring account activity to avoid unauthorized charges. The outcome of this lawsuit could influence how subscription services operate across various industries and shape future regulatory frameworks aimed at protecting consumer rights.

Source ImageSources
  • FTC sues Uber, alleging ‘deceptive’ Uber charges cancellations
    yahoo
  • FTC sues Uber, alleging ‘deceptive’ Uber charges cancellations | CNN Business
    cnn
  • FTC Sues Uber, Alleging Deceptive Billing, Cancellation Practices
    yahoo
FTC Allegations Against Uber
Uber's Defense and Legal Response
Regulatory and Consumer Implications

People Also Watch